Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR SMALLPOX - Cidofovir - BUT NOT FOR YOU
Office of Evaluation, Government Performance and Results Act - http://www1.od.nih.gov/gpra/ ^ | 2000 - 2001 (various release dates for studies) | Martinez, Bray, Huggins, ETAL

Posted on 10/19/2001 12:43:31 AM PDT by dandelion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
This is the only credible reference I have seen in regards to a possible treatment for smallpox. Cidofovir has some undesireable side effects, most notably kidney damage; but considering the horrors of smallpox, I would certainly take the risk were I infected.

Bottom line: Cidofovir is available, and appears to be an effective (if not absolute) treatment for smallpox. BUT ACCORDING TO THE NYC DEPT OF HEALTH website it will NOT BE OFFERED due to the fact it is in vitro - experimental. If threatened by smallpox, we should be offered the option to access it for treatment. We need to start asking questions NOW if we want to be able to access this possibly life-saving treatment...

1 posted on 10/19/2001 12:43:31 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Well, well, well - pretty please, would you lovely fellas give this a bump in the night? I think it might be bump worthy, especially considering that we are being told there is no treatment for smallpox...
2 posted on 10/19/2001 12:46:51 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
yes there is. smallpox vaccine works even after you get infected
3 posted on 10/19/2001 12:51:44 AM PDT by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
We shouldn't be concerned about TREATING it when we can PREVENT it altogether with vaccination. Since no one has it, vaccination is the issue. And we have the ability to prepare vaccines and get those started... first with people who have never been vaccinated and with the very old, as they will be the most vulnerable.
4 posted on 10/19/2001 12:54:44 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arielb
Considering that there are limited amounts of vaccine available (between 2 million and 15 million, depending on to whom you listen) and considering the fact that the vaccine is old and may have to be diluted to stretch it, I would certainly prefer that I have access to the drugs as well...
5 posted on 10/19/2001 12:54:54 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: piasa
The vaccines that you and I received had a shelf-life of 10-12 years according to medical experts - and once again, thanks to clinton, we have NO plant currently producing vaccine. The planned DILUTIONS of the 15 million vaccines available will not be ready until NEXT SUMMER. If a massive outbreak of smallpox occurs, many may be exposed who will have no access to vaccines. We will need to have the option of accessing this available drug which is currently in production.
6 posted on 10/19/2001 1:02:09 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: dandelion
Interesting medication but it needs a lot more testing.
9 posted on 10/19/2001 1:31:13 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: piasa; JohnHuang2
NOTE: Common name of Cidofovir - "Vistide". A search of the term on this Formulary page reveals another clue as to why the government may not be offering this drug up front - it is expensive. Gilead Sciences offers programs to make the drug available to HIV patients... what, I wonder, are the chances they would make it more available to victims of a massive outbreak of smallpox??
10 posted on 10/19/2001 1:34:04 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
If my children have smallpox, I think that they are worthy of the same consideration as an AIDS patient...
11 posted on 10/19/2001 1:35:02 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
YES!
12 posted on 10/19/2001 1:56:36 AM PDT by gueroloco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
...
13 posted on 10/19/2001 1:59:49 AM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trax2001
The virus can mutate all it wants but it is still susceptible to the cowpox vaccine.
14 posted on 10/19/2001 2:07:42 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: piasa
That is, IF you can get the vaccine... this drug is available, and they are saying it appears to be effective against smallpox. The vaccine will not be available until AFTER SUMMER 2003 - and unless you are one of the luck 15-40 million who are chosen to receive it, you will NOT get a vaccine. Cidofovir is already available, it's already FDA approved, and it's already been proclaimed by the government as probably effective against smallpox. It's dangerous, but so is the smallpox vaccine. Cidofovir's available, the vaccine is not. The government has already approved it and tested it - in event of smallpox infection, we should be able to have the option to use cidofovir if we choose.
15 posted on 10/19/2001 2:15:43 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
I have used a fair amount of cidofovir to treat CMV.

It is very difficult to use-it is IV (intravenous) only, and causes major side effects, including kidney failure severe enough to require discontinuation, in over 50% of those treated.

The IV infusion itself is difficult and prolonged.

I am interested in the reference to ribavirin, which is used to treat Hepatitis C and is now available in large quaantities both here and overseas.

16 posted on 10/19/2001 2:28:06 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
Emedicine has a listing of test results and dosages, (use control+find for the word "vistide", the brand name for cidofovir)...
17 posted on 10/19/2001 2:29:44 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
Hey, cidofovir looks promising for sure. However, it may not work. The FDA has approved its use for the treatment of CMV retinitis, NOT SMALLPOX. So the FDA believes it is relatively safe, under certain clinical conditions, and relatively effective, under certain clinical conditions, for the treatment of CMV retinitis. It will be VERY VERY DIFFICULT to work out if it's effective against smallpox, because (thankfully) no-one has the disease -- so there's no population on which to test it. Animal models are suggestive but far from conclusive -- plenty of drugs don't get through phase III trials (the big efficacy trials that do double-blinded tests on a big population). So a hint of caution may be in order.
18 posted on 10/19/2001 2:30:00 AM PDT by slhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: slhill
Definitely caution - this would NOT be something one would want to do as a "precautionary measure". However, according to the Emedicine link " Cidofovir (Vistide)- A nucleoside analog DNA polymerase inhibitor; if administered within 48 h of exposure, may attenuate or avoid infection; adefovir, cidofovir, and ribavirin are under investigation for smallpox".

Since we have nothing better, and those who have been studying it have come up with suggested doses, it begs the question - will we be given the option to try cidofovir, considering that it's risks are - by all accounts - significantly lower than that of smallpox?

19 posted on 10/19/2001 2:38:36 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Does that rate of kidney failure reflect those patients taking Probenecid? I understand that the rate of kidney failure is quite high in those patients who are not taking Probenecid, I'm curious to the renal failure rate of those who take Cidofovir with Probenecid. Probably no one would prescribe it WITHOUT Probenecid, but I'm not sure if their are contraindications for HIV patients to take Probenecid...
20 posted on 10/19/2001 2:52:02 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson