Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia Goobernatorial Debate. Live thread
Tonight

Posted on 10/10/2001 5:04:32 PM PDT by Inspector Harry Callahan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: Coop
Warner stumbled on several questions, and basically got massacred by the teenage girl asking why Mr. Education's kids were all in private school

Sorry i missed it, Coop. I would have paid $$$ to see the question/answer above!!

61 posted on 10/11/2001 5:05:08 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Coop
lol
62 posted on 10/11/2001 5:34:28 AM PDT by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I just fired off this letter to the Times-Disgrace.

Dear Editor,

In the Wednesday, October 10 gubernatorial debate, moderator Larry Sabato asked the candidates, out of the last six governors - three Republican, three Democrat, to name their most admired from each party.

Both gentlemen selected Douglas Wilder as their most admired Democrat and cited his fiscal responsibility in dealing with the state budget. Mr. Earley selected George Allen as his most admired Republican. Mr. Warner named Linwood Holton.

Mr. Warner's choice was not surprising. Mr. Holton has endorsed Mr. Warner's candidacy as well as the candidacy of his son-in-law for Lt. Governor. Plus, Virginia Republicans know that Mr. Holton has been out of step with the party for years.

But the problem is that Mr. Holton was not one of the choices offered. Out of the last six Governors, the three Republicans are John Dalton, George Allen and Jim Gilmore. Had he been educated in Virginia schools, Mr. Warner might have realized his mistake.

I wish Mr. Sabato had redirected the question. I'd like to hear Mr. Warner answer the question correctly.

Which Warner.
63 posted on 10/11/2001 5:34:34 AM PDT by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mike2right
Had he been educated in Virginia schools, Mr. Warner might have realized his mistake.

Sweet!!! I'm going to send something along those lines to the Wash Times and ComPost.

64 posted on 10/11/2001 5:39:12 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan; All VA FReepers
Wasn't there a question regarding Warner's wealth? He mentioned the Washington Post in his reply.

Something along the lines of "Are you trying to question the WP's integrity?"

I'm sure a FReeper can come up with the transcript and the actual quote.

65 posted on 10/11/2001 5:59:12 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mike2right
"Mr. Earley selected George Allen as his most admired Republican. Mr. Warner named Linwood Holton."

Holton is not that good a reference. He has a reputation as a wino RINO and is Kommie Kaines father in law, which should make his opinion, even if made while lucid, less than objective. Side issue, I saw post yesterday that the million moms are getting ready to march again, Kaine should be asked if he plans to recommend to his successor as mayor of Richmond to continue the practice that he established of sending busloads of moms to march @ taxpayer expense.

66 posted on 10/11/2001 6:05:10 AM PDT by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: csvset
The questioner asked Warner about the impression that some had that he made his fortune unethically or perhaps illegally. The questioner said the practice is now forbidden. Warner got visibly upset, and started raising his voice at Earley because he had an article about this on his website. (FYI, that article is floating around FR somewhere - can't remember who wrote it.) Warner did his usual whining and bleating about negative attacks. He really did a fairly poor job of answering the question, but then Earley completely dropped the ball by ignoring that question and droning on and on about tax cuts yet again.

Warner - 1 point for answering question, but ineffectively
Earley - 1 point because he's not a dork

67 posted on 10/11/2001 6:22:10 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Did not get back in time to record the Earley/Warner debate. My apologies. Read this thread and you'll probably be grateful you didn't suffer through Warner's nauseating performance. :-)

I'll second that.

68 posted on 10/11/2001 6:39:45 AM PDT by Mindy11277
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Coop
FYI, that article is floating around FR somewhere - can't remember who wrote it.

Morton Blackwell wrote the article: Mark Warner's Fortune is nothing but ill-gotten gain.

It's a little overboard, even for Blackwell. As much as we'd like to be able to label Warner as a crook, at the time what he did was legal. He saw an opportunity and took advantage of it.

69 posted on 10/11/2001 6:48:44 AM PDT by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mike2right
I agree. I thought Blackwell's article was poorly timed and over the top. And Earley did well not to attack Warner on this issue. But he completely ignored the question, which always annoys me during debates.
70 posted on 10/11/2001 7:01:14 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Dork Warner. (That's my new name for him, and I think it fits quite nicely.)

Reminds me of Mary Sue Terrier.

71 posted on 10/11/2001 10:07:10 AM PDT by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Thanks for the effort in summarizing this debate. Due to a cranky almost-two-year-old, I didn't even get to watch the soundbites on the 11:00 news.
72 posted on 10/11/2001 10:33:54 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mike2right
Not only did the RTD and WP for the most part ignore the WJLA poll, even WJLA is ignoring it. I've looked for several days now on their website and I can't seem to find it. I emailed them asking for a link and have yet to hear from them. I suffered through their evening broadcast the night they were supposed to air it, but I never heard a peep about it.

Some things never change in our elections, but Virginia republicans have won increasingly in spite of a biased media.

73 posted on 10/11/2001 1:03:11 PM PDT by Ligeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Thanks for the effort in summarizing this debate. Due to a cranky almost-two-year-old, I didn't even get to watch the soundbites on the 11:00 news.

If you had a cranky two-year old, you captured the essence of half of this debate. :-)

74 posted on 10/11/2001 1:39:35 PM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
What a sorry choice of candidates. I wish they could both lose. A scalawag and a carpetbagger!
75 posted on 10/11/2001 3:53:21 PM PDT by BnBlFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
"Holton is not that good a reference. He has a reputation as a wino RINO and is Kommie Kaines father in law, which should make his opinion, even if made while lucid, less than objective."

Dittoes...Holton was/is typical of the embarrassing ol' CountryClub Republicans who were pitiful also-rans in the State for years before George Allen came in and helped to transform the Party. Of course, with the sorry performance of the GOPers in the State Senate, we've still got a good bit of transforming to do!!

Old Dominion FReegards...MUD

76 posted on 10/11/2001 9:23:48 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mike2right
"I just fired off this letter to the Times-Disgrace."

Great letter, my FRiend!! I shall be perusin' the RTD for it in the upcoming days.

FReegards...MUD

BTW...I thought Lefties called it the Times-Disgrace becuz of Ross MacKenzie's conservatism as Editor; although I agree with you because the remainder of the paper is decidely Leftist, IMHO.

77 posted on 10/11/2001 9:29:03 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
What a sorry choice of candidates. I wish they could both lose. A scalawag and a carpetbagger!

Yeah, well, I wish you didn't carry the fine USMC name on your profile. We all have our crosses to bear.

78 posted on 10/12/2001 6:10:42 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: mike2right
Did that fine letter of yours ever make it into print? I sent similar letters to both the Wash Times and ComPost, but neither one contacted me. (No surprise from the ComPost, but I'm disappointed the Times didn't print it.)
79 posted on 10/17/2001 7:11:11 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson