Skip to comments.
FBI Believes Anthrax Strain ManMade
AP ^
| 10-9-01
| Karen Gullo
Posted on 10/09/2001 6:16:10 PM PDT by dogbyte12
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
1
posted on
10/09/2001 6:16:10 PM PDT
by
dogbyte12
To: dogbyte12
BTTT
2
posted on
10/09/2001 6:19:44 PM PDT
by
firewalk
To: dogbyte12
Manmade like Soviet Lab manmade, or manmade like Amateur College Student manmade?
3
posted on
10/09/2001 6:20:15 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
To: dogbyte12
In Florida, there were growing signs that the appearance of anthrax at a tabloid newspaper office may not have involved terrorism, but would be treated as an isolated criminal act. huh? the rest of the article made sense. what ?
To: dogbyte12
I sure am happy that all the terrorists are ded. Since the 19 blew themselves up, that means a sudden anthrax outbreak can't possibly be terrorism related.... /sheeple
5
posted on
10/09/2001 6:23:28 PM PDT
by
abner
To: dogbyte12
Let me guess.........next they'll be saying that it came from some country of Middle Eastern origin.
To: dogbyte12
". . .may not have involved terrorism, but would be treated as an isolated criminal act"
My a** it did not involve terrorism!
Thanks for the post
To: Lazamataz
I'll bet the second. Here is why: If they got it from the Soviets, it would have been present in the Middle East, and used in Israel. The only reason to do an anthrax attack on the U.S. rather than Israel would be if this is where you obtained the anthrax.
Don't forget, here you can just walk right in to our country and get a job as a low level assistant in one of any thousands of labs and order Anthrax strains "for research". At that point, it is better off to use it here than to try to smuggle it back to Israel.
To: Lazamataz
Feh, as Anthrax is a bacteria and therefore has DNA, can one batch of Anthrax be differentiated from another?
Enquiring minds want to know...
9
posted on
10/09/2001 6:24:42 PM PDT
by
Hoplite
To: dogbyte12
In Florida, there were growing signs that the appearance of anthrax at a tabloid newspaper office may not have involved terrorism, but would be treated as an isolated criminal act.UH OH--how many ways can this statement be interpreted?
The first one that came to mind is that the tabloid workers may have been experimenting for a story.
Other theories?
To: Hoplite
Yes, as long as the DNA can be sequenced. I'll bet our guys are hard at work evaluating the DNA code of this germ and comparing it to the other carrier's isolated specimen.
To: dogbyte12
Anthrax would be considered a weapon of mass destruction regardless of how many people it kills. We could respond with nukes and be justified in doing so. Once we finally figure out that the Saudis are not our friends, we ought to drop one on Mecca. They destroy our symbols, we destroy theirs.
12
posted on
10/09/2001 6:29:02 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: abner
Since there have been no cases of anthrax in the US in decades - where would someone pickup the stuff? In addition they say it was man made. In a kitchen with a bunsen burner? Don't make me laugh. This is terrorism, it required a foreign government to provide the product.
13
posted on
10/09/2001 6:29:56 PM PDT
by
gore3000
To: glock rocks
"huh? the rest of the article made sense. what ?" I agree. I think it's called, 'talking out both sides of your @SS.'
14
posted on
10/09/2001 6:31:32 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Lazamataz
Laz,
Weaponizing Anthrax or other bio is rather difficult. Takes device called a "Bio-reactor." Sort of like a device that cooks up bio then siphons it off. About the size of a 80 cup coffee percolator at a college student union. Cost is about $50K.
Also takes team with extensive training in post graduate bio work. Not a solo op.
Like any fissionable materiel can be traced back to the nuclear reactor in which it was made, they may be able to trace this anthrax back.
Countires capable: US, GB, Russia, PRC, Ukraine, Belorus, Germany, France, Scandanavian, Israel, Iraq, probably Libya and Syria.
Strongly suggest book Cobra Event. Paperback at any large book store. Spells out all tech.
Finally, in weaponizing a bug, you can change charactaristics, so as to make it as catchable as common cold, deadly as smallpox, resistant to drugs, long incubation period, etc.
This is very bad shit.
To: NautiNurse
I think there would be more than 1 place if it was the Bin Laden group. From the get go, I thought this anthrax was man made, but considering the co-ordinated attack on the WTC, Pentagon, and either the Capital or the White House on the plane that crashed, it makes me doubt this was their work as well. Could have been a sympathizer, but... I believe they would have done this to several places simultaneously for maximum effect. Ya do it in one office, it may not work, it could be poo-pooed as a fluke, could be attributed to a lone nut angry at somebody who works there, etc...
Bin Laden's folks would have anthraxed 50 offices with envelopes in 50 states for maximum effect. Sent it to the largest paper in each state. Even if they got just one person sick with each letter, the media effect would be amazing if 1 journalist died in each state.
To: Kalashnikov_68
Anthrax would be considered a weapon of mass destruction regardless of how many people it kills. We could respond with nukes and be justified in doing so.
EXACTLY why this will never be offically declared a terrorist act. We do not have the will to use nukes!
To: dogbyte12
"Investigators so far have found no evidence linking the Florida incident to terrorism, although the manufactured nature of the bacteria suggests criminal activity may be involved, the officials said, speaking only on condition of anonymity." Yeah right. Common criminals here in the US are involved in the use of man made anthrax all the time. Just another wacky criminal, no terrorists to see here. /sarcasm off
What's this nonsense about "no evidence of a link to terrorism"? SPREADING MAN MADE ANTHRAX SPORES IS A TERRORIST ACT!
Or is the FBI only interested in links to Bin Laden terrorism? I thought Bush said this was a war on terrorism, that we would offer no safe harbor to anyone or any nation that involved itself in terrorism.
18
posted on
10/09/2001 6:33:27 PM PDT
by
Bob Mc
To: dogbyte12
It's about time they confirmed something we all already knew!!
To: Kalashnikov_68
Sweet, oh baby, that's tempting.
I'd feel like one of two immature little girls stompin' each others doll house though.
Who remembers a fiction action drama novel called The Madi written long ago talkin' 'bout this very thing?
20
posted on
10/09/2001 6:34:12 PM PDT
by
norraad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson