Skip to comments.
Living a lie: Why you can't be anti-military and pro-freedom
Union Leader ^
| Oct 09,2001
Posted on 10/09/2001 2:26:14 AM PDT by 2Trievers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Amen.
1
posted on
10/09/2001 2:26:14 AM PDT
by
2Trievers
To: 2Trievers
"SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM"
A wise Roman Senator said that, long ago, when intelligent men could still achieve public office. (Although I believe that Winston Churchill was fond of this maxim, as well).
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
MANCHU!
And it's true. There's only a pacifist movement in places where the pacifists have a military to protect their right to hate the military.
3
posted on
10/09/2001 2:36:53 AM PDT
by
AlaninSA
To: 2Trievers
Notice that we never see pacifist protests in non-free nations. The oppressed people of the world are too busy trying to avoid being arrested, shot, starved or enslaved to tie-dye their T-shirts, staple peace signs to sticks and walk in circles singing John Lennon songs off key.
Truer words were never spoken.
To: 2Trievers
bump
5
posted on
10/09/2001 4:23:01 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: 2Trievers
They arent going to Afghanistan, where they would have no armed cops to stand behind, and decrying the Taliban for being militaristic and war-mongering. Ping!
To: DC FReepers, Kristin, Angelwood
I saw what was described as a daily protest of about 50 pro-terrorist nitwits outside of the White House. Please do Free Republic a huge favor and FReep these numbskulls. Thank you.
8
posted on
10/09/2001 7:27:23 AM PDT
by
Kermit
To: 2Trievers
bttt!
To: 2Trievers
The freedom to speak silly opinions in public is a luxury afforded only by the willingness of some to defend it. As such, one cannot be anti-military and pro-freedom.I remember the shock I felt at being called names for wearing the uniform in the late 70's, well after Viet Nam.
As outraged as I was, I'm still proud to have served to let even these embeciles express their opinions.
True freedom means having the choice not to serve. We either believe in Freedom or we do not.
To: 2Trievers
Sua Sponte
Rangers, Lead the way!
11
posted on
10/09/2001 7:49:20 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
To: Eagle Eye
I was in NROTC(Marine Option) in the early 80's, and I remember having lunatics scream "Baby killer!" at me... I was taken a little aback, so I said "No not yet. I haven't had the chance..." That set'em back on their heels...
Like you, proud to serve so that whackos are free to be whackos in this awesome country...
12
posted on
10/09/2001 7:53:41 AM PDT
by
g'nad
To: boston_liberty
The case has been well-made elsewhere that Gandhi was only able to succeed in his "non-violent" revolution because of the tolerant nature of the British rulers, who refrained from having his followers machine-gunned in their thousands.
I cannot see this tactic working very well against a Hitler, a Stalin, or a Saddam Hussein.
Can you?
To: 2Trievers
BUMP
14
posted on
10/09/2001 4:56:10 PM PDT
by
Bowana
To: 2Trievers
What to do if you happen upon a peace rally. 1) Approach the person talking about peace and saying there should be "no retaliation". 2) Have brief conversation, ask if military force is appropriate. 3) When they say "no," ask, "Why not?" 4) When they say, "because that would just cause more innocent deaths, which would be awful, and we should not cause more violence". 5) Punch him in the face... hard. 6) When he gets up to punch you back, point out that it would be a mistake, and contrary to his values, to punch you because he would be increasing the violence. 7) When he agrees that he has pledged not to commit violence, punch him in the face again... harder this time. 8) Repeat steps 5 through 8 until he understands that sometimes it is necessary to punch back.
To: X-Expeditor;RaceBannon
Dear X-E
Your post is super! Thank you ... but that is why I aways stand behind RaceBannon at every rally! If you knew him ... no further explanation would be necessary.
To: Jim Robinson
OK. How in the blue Hell am I supposed to bookmark a
particularly good thread, as
this???I know that, ostensibly, there was a reason for making the changes (which resulted in your site looking stupid and ugly). And, I will not go further in my opinions of the "new" look (kinda like the "new" Coca-Cola formula). But, the bookmark aspect is one I find quite helpful, in keeping track of threads (**that I think**) are important to keep close...?
FReegards,
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: one_particular_harbour
Thanks. Found it.
Still think that the new look sucks hind tit. (Old farm expression, for you equal-rights women who want to start a fight...)
FReegards.
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
peaceniks are like bad parents. Their called enablers.
20
posted on
10/11/2001 8:06:50 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson