Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE TERRORIST ATROCITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
10 Downing Street ^ | October 3, 2001 | British Government

Posted on 10/04/2001 8:22:29 AM PDT by PrivacyChampion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 10/04/2001 8:22:29 AM PDT by PrivacyChampion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
71. Any minute now, we'll be dropping by for a visit, Osama old chap!
2 posted on 10/04/2001 8:26:49 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
"Al Qaida" (the Base).

72. All your Base are belong to U.S.

If I didn't say it, someone else would have.

3 posted on 10/04/2001 8:32:58 AM PDT by Mr. Bungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Another British BUMP!
4 posted on 10/04/2001 8:40:40 AM PDT by father_elijah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Will the New York Times shut up and get on board now, or is there some other proof they require?
5 posted on 10/04/2001 8:42:34 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Interesting that it's getting a lot of hits over there. They've had to change their home page to accommodate it.

 

Please accept our apologies for the current disruption to the 10 Downing Street website.

Following a statement by the Prime Minister this morning to the House of Commons the Government made available a document concerning responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States on the 11th September 2001.

Due to the large number of visitors attempting to view this document we have temporarily altered the Number 10 homepage to default to this statement which can be found below.

Full access to the 10 Downing Street website will be restored as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely

10 Downing Street webteam.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law. Intelligence often cannot be used evidentially, due both to the strict rules of admissibility and to the need to protect the safety of sources. But on the basis of all the information available HMG is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this document.

 

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE TERRORIST ATROCITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 11 SEPTEMBER 2001

 

INTRODUCTION

1. The clear conclusions reached by the government are:

 

... and the rest that you have...

6 posted on 10/04/2001 8:43:16 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Anticipating a question, I believe that 'HMG' = Her Majesty's Government.
7 posted on 10/04/2001 8:45:43 AM PDT by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Bump for later.
8 posted on 10/04/2001 8:47:41 AM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Bump
9 posted on 10/04/2001 8:52:36 AM PDT by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Thank God for the United Kingdom, whose people and government, recognizing the fact that we are 1.)stunned; and 2.)hampered by internal enemies in the PC crowd; have written this succinct and clear summary of our reasons for going to war.

I only wish our American leaders would follow their lead, and stop trying to ass-kiss the worthless international arab community.

PC is dead.

Long live the U.K.

10 posted on 10/04/2001 9:14:19 AM PDT by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
The joke begun at Nuremburg continues...
11 posted on 10/04/2001 9:20:38 AM PDT by Goblins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Greetings all: My devoted spouse wishes to know if anyone understands how the terrorists were able to get boxcutters through the airport metal detectors. Can anyone advise?
12 posted on 10/04/2001 9:24:20 AM PDT by celeste_aida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celeste_aida
There have been box-cutters found hidden in the seats of aborted flights. Some speculation has occurred that cleaning crews or food service workers may have hidden them in the seats prior to take-off.

Also, at Logan, the metal detectors were often ignored, as was shown in the Fox News documentary done earlier this year.

13 posted on 10/04/2001 9:28:42 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Thanks Miss Marple. Good detecting.
14 posted on 10/04/2001 9:40:56 AM PDT by celeste_aida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Here is an experiment. You know all these Muslim schools that indoctrinate boys (and girls) with hate for America? Many of these schools (Malaysia, Indonesia) are financed by oil-receipts from the Saudi Kingdom. The Saudis promote a type of Islam called "Wahibbism", which is very extreme and fanatical (Osama Bin Laden grew up in this tradition). So, here is the experiment: Keep all the schools, and keep all the hate-rhetoric. Except everytime they mention who specifically the enemy is, change the "target" from America to, say, North Korea. After about 12 months of this hateful rhetoric in over 1,000 religious "Muslim schools", with death to North Koreans and the great Satan = North Korea, observe the effects. Rumsfeld should insist on this "experiment" as he negotiates with the Saudi leaders.
15 posted on 10/04/2001 9:49:45 AM PDT by Aggressive Calvinist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bungle
Make your time, Osama!
All your Al Qaida are belong to us!
You have no chance.
Someone set him up the bomb.
16 posted on 10/04/2001 10:01:47 AM PDT by KirkandBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
71. Despite having clear knowledge of Mr. Bin Laden's stated aims and demonstrated abilities, and despite the fact that Mr. Bin Laden and his associates have been taking credit for mass killings of U.S. civilians and military personel for nearly a decade, the Clinton Administration chose to do nothing about him, allowing him time to grow into the world-threatening cancer he now is. Hopefully Bush will be able to rid the world of this malignant, festering group of murderers without killing the patient.
17 posted on 10/04/2001 10:09:21 AM PDT by Melinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
This is a pathetic joke, worthy of that Blair puke. "10 Downing Street" has been protecting mid-east terrorists for years. It's no secret. London is the first off-shore in the world where billions of terrorists and organized crime money is laundered. The Sudanese tried to turn very precise info about bin Laden over to M16 and were rejected, four years in a row. This was reported in the Observer. After the attacks against our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania (220 dead), the Sudanese put under arrest two close bin Laden guys and sent a letter to our FBI. Albright refused to process a demand for extradiction because the US, she said, "could not have contacts with a terrorist nation". That too is public knowledge. London is also where the stock manipulations that took place prior the attacks came from.

Blair has the blood of many people on his hands. I am convinced he also has the blood of our 6,000 as well. I hope GW dismantles that whorehouse Great britain has become the same way that Roosevelt dismantled their empire. Conservatives who salivate over our "ally" are no better than the liberals who salivated over clinton. Blair is nothing but clintongorian puke. The no 1 center of terrorism in the world is London. The second is Hamburg. Let's go.

18 posted on 10/04/2001 10:18:24 AM PDT by Pipers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Web Scam is more appropriate.
19 posted on 10/04/2001 10:52:45 AM PDT by Pipers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pipers

Web Scam is more appropriate.

Kinda hard to get a "scam" out of this particular web address --

http://www.number-10.gov.uk/

You'll note the "gov.uk" address, which can only be used by the government, itself. Are you suggesting that someone "took over" the government's web page and placed the incriminating stuff about Osama bin Laden on there -- instead of the UK government? :) :)

Or perhaps you're one of those Islamic apologists. Have you cashed Osama's check yet?

20 posted on 10/04/2001 11:17:36 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson