Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

L’Affaire Coulter
National Review Online ^ | 10/3/01 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 10/03/2001 11:35:13 AM PDT by BamaG

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-282 next last
To: Stallone
You are correct with your post its a slam dunk for Ann not goldy-boy. This just in from the commies and are they happy. Thanks to NR!

HOROWITZ TO COULTER: I GOT YOU, BABE!! Taliban Publicity Hound Hires Disgraced Lunatic Wing-Nut Factions Solidify Horowitz Sheet Becomes Taliban Cave of Last Resort "Annie's Got a Gun," Coos New Boss

In a late-breaking development, American Taliban propagandist and publicity hound David Horowitz has given the disgraced Ann Coulter a new position on the staff of his little-read on-line magazine.

Coulter was recently fired by the National Review for her off-the-wall attacks on Muslims and other dark-complexioned Americans. This follows her dismissal by MSNBC for some earlier crackpot diatribes.

In making his hiring announcement, ex-Stalinist Horowitz had some choice words for National Review:

"What happened to Ann falls into a pattern that we... like to call 'PC McCarthyism,'" Horowitz observed.

The Scaife-funded Horowitz also praised Coulter's slurs and smears as "articulate, forceful - and cheeky."

The hiring is the latest development in the continuing crack-up of the American Taliban Right. According to intelligence experts, the thuggish, megalomaniacal Horowitz faction has now decided to challenge the Goldberg/Lowry NR forces for control of the Taliban's secondary tier of operations.

The primary tier remains under the firm control of Chief Ideologue William Kristol and the Weekly Taliban Standard. Intense speculation has arisen about whether, in the wake of Horowitz's power, grab, C.I. Kristol will try to reinforce his own position by hiring Andrew "Gap Model" Sullivan -- himself recently fired as TRB columnist at the New Republic. Like Coulter, Sullivan has a checkered employment history.

It would appear, according to one official who wishes to remain anonymous, that the internecine warfare between Horowitz and NR has distracted both sides from the American Taliban's major offensive, which has been to attack Secretary of State Colin Powell and President Bill Clinton.

Sullivan has yet to issue any reaction to Coulter's attack on NR's editors as "girly-boys." Taliban watchers are divided over whether "Gap Model" will construe the remarks, as Horowitz does, as merely irreverent and "cheeky," or whether he will take offense and deepen the factionalism.

In what may be a related development, NR and its on-line operation have yet to acknowledge that Coulter has been fired, or to explain to readers why.

Political commentators expressed little surprise at today's events.

"Horowitz and Coulter have long been making goo-goo eyes at each other," one source observed. "They have for years together defined the term, 'right-wing crackpot.' This just cinches the deal. David and Ann: Perfect Together!"

The only major open question seems to be whether Horowitz's actions represent an additional power move by his patron Richard Mellon Scaife. Scaife and Coulter have a long history of cooperation dating back to Coulter's links to the Scaife-funded Federalist Society and the conspiracy to remove President Bill Clinton. And Scaife is the chief funder of Horowitz's operations.

Logistics experts familiar with the movements of the American Taliban have had additional reactions to today's news.

"It appears that Horowitz will now provide the American Taliban with its cave of last resort, for the network's more demented crusaders," one official remarked.

David and Ann. All part of MWO's 'round-the-clock coverage in its continuing series, "The Right Fights Itself."

141 posted on 10/03/2001 1:59:11 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
"Time for Ann to get off the 'Susan Ethridge' train"

Ethridge?

Are you perhaps thinking of Susan Estrus?

142 posted on 10/03/2001 2:00:34 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Stallone
In the wake of her invade-and-Christianize-them column, Coulter wrote a long, rambling rant of a response to her critics that was barely coherent. She's a smart and funny person, but this was Ann at her worst — emoting rather than thinking, and badly needing editing and some self-censorship, or what is commonly referred to as "judgment."

If the article I just read (provided by your link) is the article that sissy boy was referring to then I have only one thing to say to nancy boy.

Liar, liar pants on fire.

143 posted on 10/03/2001 2:02:00 PM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Yes, it's true. I forgot to include my /sarcasm tag. Argh...
144 posted on 10/03/2001 2:02:13 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I'd suggest they settle this thing out in the parking lot but alot of neocons would probably faint at the sight of Jonah's blood.

ROTFL!! Oh lord that is funny.

145 posted on 10/03/2001 2:05:37 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jonah in lace panties is NOT the visual I needed.

Now AC, ......

146 posted on 10/03/2001 2:07:15 PM PDT by sayfer bullets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BamaG
Rich wrote her another e-mail, engaging her on this point, and asking her — in more diplomatic terms — to approach the whole controversy not as a PR-hungry, free-swinging pundit on Geraldo, but as a careful writer.

To IMAGINE that she didn't see fit to answer such an objective, reasoned response...

Reminds me of what Ann wrote about 12 page letters that begin with "Ann, you slut..." Yeah, please, let me discuss this further with you. Rich revealed his contempt for Ann if he really wrote that to her. This article drips with Jonah's contempt.

Jonah Girlyberg goes further to suggest that, well, there's more he could go into, but he's choosing the high road instead. Aside from being a cheap shot, it's disingenuous. The high road would have been not to write this smackdown at all.

Ann's second column made a great deal of sense -- common sense of the kind we used to have when our nation and its citizens were threatened. Deportation would be prudent, if unpopular. And the last two exceptions have a twisted brilliance too -- no Muslim who is truly a threat to us would agree to spy; and any Senator who would vouch for someone by name could reveal a great deal about themselves and their loyalties, couldn't they?

"If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." -- Samuel Adams

Ann is in good company when she avoids pulling her verbal punches.

147 posted on 10/03/2001 2:09:23 PM PDT by LARoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
That's ok. JohnRob's new filtering software closes all open tags so that no subsequent posts were filled with your sarcasm.

Except this one ;-)

148 posted on 10/03/2001 2:09:26 PM PDT by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: BamaG
It was rude and stupid of her to go on TV and rip on a former employer. That is not adult behavior, it is the behavior of a twit.

She lost lots of credibility here. And NRO has Victor Davis Hanson, I'll keep reading.

149 posted on 10/03/2001 2:09:44 PM PDT by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspirator1
I wish Ann would take this and answer all goldies spew with the Ann Coulter way. Point by point.
150 posted on 10/03/2001 2:12:44 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
"Apparently, in Ann's mind, she constitutes the thin blonde line between freedom and tyranny"

"Is this Jonah Goldberg's idea of good "professional" writing?"

No, it's obviously his idea of tit for tat. Or vice-versa, as the case may be.

151 posted on 10/03/2001 2:13:04 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BamaG
I think NR was right.
152 posted on 10/03/2001 2:15:04 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaG
Coulter told the Washington Post, which first reported the story, ``If National Review has no spine they are not my allies.'' She did not return a phone call from The Associated Press seeking comment.

Coulter's column is distributed by Universal Press Syndicates, which said Tuesday that it would continue to represent her. ``While Ann Coulter's columns on the September 11 attack may have offended some readers, she does have a right to express her opinion,'' a statement from Universal said. ``Readers may then choose to agree or disagree with that opinion, which we believe is the essential purpose of having a newspaper op-ed page.''

Coulter is a frequent commentator on cable news shows and rose to prominence during the Clinton impeachment scandal.

Now doesn't NR look like fools?

153 posted on 10/03/2001 2:15:34 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartBlonde
"If Ann isn't careful, she's going to be David Brock in a skirt."

Is this world really big enough for two of them? :)

Don "I never quite figured out the mass-infatuation with A.C." Joe

154 posted on 10/03/2001 2:19:56 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #155 Removed by Moderator

Comment #156 Removed by Moderator

Comment #157 Removed by Moderator

To: sharktrager
Is this the same Libertarian Party that ran Howard Stern as a Gubernatorial candidate in New York?

No, that'd be the NY LP. I believe this LP was in Virginia or some such. State LP's are independent bodies. The national LP can disaffiliate them, but that just means they can't send delegates to national LP conventions.

At the time, the NY LP barely existed. All other state and the national LP looked on with disdain -- but not much to be done about their grab for the limelight.

In the Coulter incident, that state LP made the right call. Hats off to them.

158 posted on 10/03/2001 2:30:07 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
I think you summed it up pretty well. Personally, I'm an Ann fan and an NRO fan. Regardless of what you think of the columns, no can can personally insult their boss on TV and not get canned. And Ann should know the difference between editing and censorship.

Her columns are always a good read, but she looks like she's losing her grip a little bit on this one. Go Chiefs, CM

159 posted on 10/03/2001 2:30:24 PM PDT by ChiefsMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Nope Ann did nothing wrong here it was NR who should apologize to Ann and their readers for handing the leftist/democrats a small victory and hope. Thats what this drival of a man did to the right.

You sound like A+Bert. You're on this jag about this little dust-up hurting "the right."

Most of "the right" doesn't even know about it, and wouldn't care about if they did.

Ann and Jonah ain't Jeanne Kirkpatrick and George Will.

It doesn't look like anybody's going to apologize, so you may as well move on and hope Coulter doesn't vanish into the ether over at Frontpage.

160 posted on 10/03/2001 2:32:43 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-282 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson