Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The real Muslim extremists
The New Statesman ^ | 1 okt 2001 | Tariq Ali

Posted on 10/02/2001 8:54:10 AM PDT by konijn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2001 8:54:10 AM PDT by konijn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: konijn Travis McGee;sneakypete;Chapita;harpseal;madrussian
Wahhabi info bump!
I remember Tariq Ali, the author, as a leftist

Tariq Ali homepage

 

3 posted on 10/02/2001 9:04:50 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konijn Travis McGee;sneakypete;Chapita;harpseal;madrussian
Sheikh Mohammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab, the inspirer of this sect, was an 18th-century peasant who tired of tending date palms and grazing cattle and began to preach locally, calling for a return to the "pure" beliefs of the seventh century. He opposed the excessive veneration of the prophet Mohammad, denounced the worship of holy places and shrines, and stressed the "unity of one god". He also insisted on Islamic punishment beatings and more: adulterers should be stoned to death; thieves should have limbs amputated; criminals should be executed in public.
4 posted on 10/02/2001 9:07:19 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
We need to move asap to energy independence, and let them drink their oil.

We are going to see an oil embargo within the year I think.

5 posted on 10/02/2001 9:12:30 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
18th-century peasant... He also insisted on Islamic punishment beatings and more: adulterers should be stoned to death; thieves should have limbs amputated; criminals should be executed in public.

Before getting too judgmental about this "reformer," I suggest looking up the punishments in vogue in much of Christendom at the time, even in the "advanced countries."

The Spanish Inquisition was burning heretics, and witches were being burned in Scotland.

In England, starving children were hanged for stealing a loaf of bread.

In New York City, a teenage girl girl was hanged for stealing the shoe buckles of another girl.

The true scandal is that the Saudi regime hasn't moved on from this period.

I note that the author doesn't have much to say about what we should do about this regime.

6 posted on 10/02/2001 9:20:09 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Islam is still stuck too much in primitive vindictive medieval behavior. One thing to behave like this 500 years ago. Quite another in the interlinked world of today where information and knowledge travels across borders. 

Islam does not get a pass just because the Christian world's behavior 500 years ago. [I know you know this:)]

7 posted on 10/02/2001 9:26:36 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
We should have a crash project in cold fusion and see if there is anything to it. Spend $50,000,000 to find out...to evaluate.

I would like nothing better than to be free of these flakey MidEast despots and dictators.

8 posted on 10/02/2001 9:29:26 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Manny Festo
Exactly right about the real nature of this war. Is anyone foolish enough to believe that bin Laden has any more concern about the people of Afganistan than he does the Palestinians? He cares no more for them than he does the people of America.

How we can win a war against a billion or more people is an interesting question however. Though it must be fought. And the fight is truly with this pathetic excuse for a religion whose Koran is concocted froom Mohammed's trash not even written.

9 posted on 10/02/2001 9:30:40 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
The horror that will follow Western exit from the Arabian peninsula will be nearly unprecedented in human history ... but so be it if the saner voices will not speak out for co-existence, sadly.

Fundamentalists being directed by the demon of bloodlust will chastise and sanitize Islam, wrenching Islamic people out of the modern world, back into a feudal state reminiscent of the 600AD world in which Mohammed arose to become the Prophet of Islam. al Saud family tried to bring the Moslem peoples of Saudi Arabia into modernization, eventually, but the temptation to revert to simplicity is inherent in fundamentalist Islam. So be it, but if we leave wholly, we must lay waste to vast societal holds on biological and chemical weapons as we leave the area of the Middle East to deal with their own demons; we cannot afford to leave madmen holding weapons of mass destruction for they will end the world rather than allow modernity to sully their 'faith'.

10 posted on 10/02/2001 9:31:51 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Good points...
11 posted on 10/02/2001 9:32:33 AM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: dennisw
Islamic countries can break out of this trp. I think Ataturk's achievement gets too little credit. He basically modernized and Westernized perhaps the most "Islamist" of all the countries of his period. There has been some backsliding, but Turkey is still a recognizably "Western" country.

I suspect one of the big problems is that Islamists have been deluded by the oil wealth in some of their countries. If this oil didn't exist, they wouldn't have to compete by actually producing things, which they cannot do and stick with an Islamist society. Their ability to gather wealth by selling the oil they coicidentally are sitting on has obscured this basic fact.

If they truly succeed in igniting a war between Islam and the West - their stated goal - they will discover that their oil wealth has existed only due to the forebearance of the West. When push comes to shove, their oil-bearing territory can be taken from them by military force, as has always happened before in history when weak countries are in control of valuable resources.

The true irony is that the rules of the Western civilization they are attacking are the only thing protecting them from becoming completely irrelevant.

13 posted on 10/02/2001 9:37:12 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Restorer
Sorry, second paragraph.

Replace "wouldn't" with "would."

15 posted on 10/02/2001 9:39:04 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Travis McGee; AGaviator; Jeep in Mazar; Squanros
Most of the Saudis I have met seemed almost schizophrenic in that they mouthed all the Wahhabi religious dogma but did not live by it. Clearly there is support for this fundamentalist version of Islam that is at war with the USA. How deep it goes and what its expression will be we shall see in the near future. I, further note, that the Shi'a sect is no great lover of American ideals. As I understand the Koran tolerance is to be practiced until the final jihad against all non muslims. The Mahdi who will lead that war will unite Islam. This is the myth structure that underlies OBL's appeal to suicide for his adherents. It also allows him to hide from the USA and our allies without accusations of cowardice from his troops.

I am still of the belief that this war will be eventually the USA against all Islam. I agree we should try to limit it to the terrorists but I am decidely not convinced that this will be possible.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

16 posted on 10/02/2001 9:40:58 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: konijn
Bin Laden was despatched to the Pakistan border and arrived in time to hear President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, turban on head, shout: "Allah is on your side."

This is scary. Very scary.

From this source.....

Unfortunately, the Council on Foreign Relations is not the only group proposing an end to the sovereignty of the United States. In 1973, The Trilateral Commission was founded to work for the same goal: a one-world government.

The Trilateral Commission's roots stem from the book, "Between Two Ages", written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970. In this book, Brzezinski praised Marxism, thought of the United States as obsolete, and praised the formation of a one-world government. His thinking closely parallels that of CFR founder Edward Mandell house.

Marxism

On page 72, Brzezinski writes: "Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief."

On page 83, he states: "Marxism disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man's ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world."

On page 123, we find: "Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality."

What Mr. Brzezinski fails to tell his readers is that approximately 100 million human beings have been murdered under Marxism "in the form of Communism" just in this Twentieth Century. It has enslaved a billion more, and has been responsible for those who live in Communist-dominated countries. There is nothing like being brainwashed!

For world government

Zbigniew Brzezinski's "Between Two Ages" was published in 1970 while he was a professor in New York City. David Rockefeller read the book and, in 1973, launched the new Trilateral Commission, whose purposes include linking North America, Western Europe, and Japan "in their economic relations, their political and defense relations, their relations with developing countries, and their relations with Communist countries."

As Newell writes: "The original literature of The Trilateral Commission also states, exactly as Brzezinski's book had proposed, that the more advanced Communist States could become partners in the alliance leading to world government. In short, David Rockefeller implemented Brzezinski's proposal."

Rockefeller appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the Director of The Trilateral Commission.

Jimmy Carter

In 1973, Jimmy Carter became a student of Brzezinski, and a founding member of the Trilateral Commission.

On March 21, 1978, "The New York Times" featured an article about Zbigniew Brzezinski's close relationship with the President. In part, it reads: "The two men met for the first time four years ago when mr. Brzezinski was executive director of The Trilateral Commission… and had the foresight to ask the then obscure former Governor of Georgia to join its distinguished ranks. Their initial teacher-student relationship blossomed during the campaign, and appears to have grown closer still."

18 posted on 10/02/2001 10:11:15 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
There's but two questions:

How can we best keep the various phases of war manageable in the number of enemies taken on at any one point?
Just how many countries can we get to rally around us (or at least against them) when the BIG balloon goes up?

19 posted on 10/02/2001 1:09:34 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Manny Festo
BTTT!
20 posted on 10/02/2001 4:13:00 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson