Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BIN-LADEN Could Have 20 Nukes: Expert
World tribune.com via FR 1999 ^ | August 9, 1999 (NOTICE THE DATE) | Worldtribune.com Staff

Posted on 09/24/2001 4:13:22 PM PDT by DrLiberty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
I was casually going thru my archive of old info saved and came across this - Who is and where is this guy Bodansky? Has he been discredited?

And didn't Bin Laden supposedly just communicate with the outside world? Your thoughts Freepers.

1 posted on 09/24/2001 4:13:22 PM PDT by DrLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
If bin Laden had useable nuclear weapons or radiological devices (fizzly old nukes), he would have used them two weeks ago.

If you believe everything you read, please read the following:

You will give me all your money.

2 posted on 09/24/2001 4:31:32 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all
If he really had these nukes, wouldnt it have been easier to just nuke a few cities in the U.S, then Hijack 4 planes.I think if he had them he would have used them.
3 posted on 09/24/2001 4:32:25 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
Excuse my ignorance...Does anyone know if these "suitcase nukes" really exist? Do we have them? Or are they just fictional creativity for movies like "The Peacemaker" with George Clooney?
4 posted on 09/24/2001 4:39:41 PM PDT by ScottinSacto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Thud
I didn't say I believed it. However....

Bin Laden has been escalating his attacks. If you beleive as I do, He was probably involved in OK City and TWA 800, along with what we know of WTC first bombing, Saudi barracks, and USS Cole.

I only offer this up for conjecture.....you haven't heard much about his capability...it might explain a few things about our response to date (or lack thereof)

Bin Laden can't be accused of being stupid. He apparently thinks and acts like a chessplayer (could he be KGB influenced - we know he had CIA contact)

6 posted on 09/24/2001 4:45:29 PM PDT by DrLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
And 20 Experts have 20 different views. 3Mile Island was almost a nuke.
7 posted on 09/24/2001 4:49:08 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Exactly.
8 posted on 09/24/2001 4:49:44 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mugwort
My fear is that he does have one or two. And that he's saving them to use when we've got our forces massed over in the MidEast, ready to strike him.

Suicide bombers pop a nuke on our troops, killing most of them and destroying all of the tanks, trucks, equipment, supplies, etc. And, simultaneously, suicide bombers take out all of Washington D.C. with the 2nd nuke.

The ensuing anarchy defies the imagination.

9 posted on 09/24/2001 4:49:46 PM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ScottinSacto
They appear to exist, in the lexicon of the intel agencies.

We know there are low-yield nukes, and miniturization is continually occurring in all other tech fields.

It is possible though, that they may have been popularized to the outside world (and thru movies like "The Peacemaker") to help gain acceptance by the public to the dangers of the spreading of nukes and terrorist use.

10 posted on 09/24/2001 4:49:56 PM PDT by DrLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Mugwort
If he "saves" them, they will fizzle before very long.

3He contamination in the tritium is a VERY big issue, particularly with "fractional-crit" devices.

12 posted on 09/24/2001 4:52:44 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
Bodansky is a "terrorism expert," which means that he's written books (mostly for the subsidy press) about terrorism used to scare the bejeezus out of Americans, and appears on TV to scare the bejeezus out of Americans.
13 posted on 09/24/2001 4:54:06 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
I have been VERY concerned by a scenario like yours.

We are forgetting that this guy's moves aren't a means to an end. He is David, we are Goliath. How do you defeat Goliath???

You get Goliath to overcommit and spread his forces far and wide. We are a giant straining for a gnat with a huge overkill of forces. We are allowing him to get us out of position and I fear we are not guarding our perimeter against possible ambushes.

Special forces should take their time, isolate them and kill them one by one. We should be careful of Bin Laden and his 60-nation network.

14 posted on 09/24/2001 4:54:47 PM PDT by DrLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
Well we know that Pakastan is ready, but we know that the US has one hell of a lead. It's a no win for them, no matter what.
15 posted on 09/24/2001 4:54:53 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
I think we should send the House Intelligence Committee to deal with Bin Laden. They could make him vanish and no one would know a thing just like Chandra.
16 posted on 09/24/2001 4:54:59 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
P.S. Think "Knights of St. John."
17 posted on 09/24/2001 4:55:56 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
The scenario you describe is downright silly. This isn't going to be a war of tanks, artillery, and massed phalanxes of troops. As for having nukes, that's one thing. Keeping those nukes OPERATIONAL is something else.

And if the Chechens actually had some nukes, they would have used them on Russia before they would have let the Russians blast Grozny into rubble--or they would have used them as revenge.

18 posted on 09/24/2001 4:56:14 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thud
If bin Laden had useable nuclear weapons or radiological devices (fizzly old nukes), he would have used them two weeks ago.

You beat me to it. These pukes always use the biggest gun in their bag. That they haven't used such weapons is a pretty good indication that they don't have them. Not that they aren't trying to get them; all the more reason to smash them into tread grease.

19 posted on 09/24/2001 4:58:52 PM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
We should also be careful of trusting Pakistan at all. The only information that their armed forces should get it pure misinformation/psyops stuff. I'm sure it will all be leaked to Al-Qaeda immediately.
20 posted on 09/24/2001 4:59:09 PM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson