Skip to comments.
WHY DOES GOD ALLOW EVIL?
Fantasywriter
| 9/17/01
| Pastor Rick Warren/Saddleback Church
Posted on 09/17/2001 12:48:19 PM PDT by RnMomof7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-410 next last
This is posted at the request of Fantasywriter
May God bless this article and use it as a springboard that we all might know Him better!
1
posted on
09/17/2001 12:48:19 PM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: Fantasywriter
bump to you for your article!
2
posted on
09/17/2001 12:49:12 PM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: Fantasywriter
bump to you for your article!
3
posted on
09/17/2001 12:49:26 PM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
Why do WE allow evil?
4
posted on
09/17/2001 12:52:13 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
To: Jerry_M,Uriel1975,CCWoody,George W. Bush,the_doc,2sheep
Bump for discussion
5
posted on
09/17/2001 12:52:36 PM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
Isaiah 45 7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
6
posted on
09/17/2001 12:53:17 PM PDT
by
vmatt
To: RnMomof7
Simple. God allows evil so that people may see that they require his grace, and will return to Him.
To: RnMomof7
"God could have eliminated all evil from our world by simply removing our ability to choose it." That's false. That doesn't even get the contours of the problem right. There are all kinds of "bad" things God allows that are not the product of free will gone awry. Examples: natural disasters that kill babies, diseases that kill babies, etc. Moreover, presumably Jesus has free will and Jesus never sins. So it's logically possible for one to have a free will and not sin. And since God can do anything that's logically possible, God could have created us such that we have free will and never sin. Yet God failed to do so.
To: BrainiusMaximus
The why so much evil? How many had to die in the Holocaust to get the same "payoff" in increased devotion, worship, faith, etc? Are you saying that if some baby gassed by the Nazi's had felt just the least little bit less pain, somehow people wouldn't be quite so devoted to God? So even if that response had the right sort of structure, it would fail to pass any kind of proportionality test.
To: vmatt
Please note I posted this at the request of another..I have a different opinion that Rick Warren on most things..I will comment on this in a while..but I wanted to let the thread get started
10
posted on
09/17/2001 1:01:31 PM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: ConsistentLibertarian
Examples: natural disasters that kill babies, diseases that kill babies, etc. According to The Bible, these are also the result of human sin. When Adam fell the Universe fell with him. If you don't like the notion of sin, think of it rather that Adam broke the Universe. It was clean, now it's dirty. It was straight, now it's twisted. It was right, now it's broken.
We broke creation, and all of creation groans for the completion of the redemption begun at the cross.
Shalom.
11
posted on
09/17/2001 1:02:27 PM PDT
by
ArGee
To: ArGee
Then the question just morphs: Why does God blame little babies for something someone else did 10,000 (?) years ago that they had no control over? Same lump. Different swatch of the carpet.
To: ArGee
We broke creation, and all of creation groans for the completion of the redemption begun at the cross. Shalom. FWIW, I believe covetness was the first sin. It is the primary reason for all other sins. The shoe fits.
To: ArGee
PS: or coherent principle of That sort of gambit also faces problems accounting for any plausible principle of fairness, since on your view all babies are equally deserving of the most painful possible death by natural disaster, yet God selects only some to die this way. And since there is no moral basis to select between them, as on your view they are all equally guilty for something they didn't do, God's choice would be morally arbitrary.
To: RnMomof7
I believe it goes back to the beginning (and we were all there, perhaps as infintesimal atomic matter, but there nonetheless). God told us (our original evolutionary/biblical parents) that we could have a life of obedient Edenistic paradise, if we did not choose knowledge. He also warned us that the other way was death and a life fraught with woe. But we chose knowledge anyway because we were tempted by the one who represents evil that if we chose knowledge we could one day "be like God." So, WE are the ones allowing evil, not God!
15
posted on
09/17/2001 1:11:00 PM PDT
by
meandog
To: Dr. Rick
Because blue light's short wavelength causes it to get scattered around much, much more by oxygen atoms in the atmosphere than the longer wavelengths of all other colors visible to us. This selective scattering makes the sky appear blue in color.
Oh wait, thats the answer to the other question.
16
posted on
09/17/2001 1:11:03 PM PDT
by
dead
To: RnMomof7
BTW: That's not to deny that people turn to God when bad things like this happen. That would be consistent with the claim that these events give strong evidence that God does not exist, since the first would be a claim about social psychology -- causes of belief formation, and the second would be about _reasons_ for those beliefs. Beliefs might be triggered by events even if the events provide no warrant or justification for the beliefs they trigger.
To: meandog
Dude, I wasn't there. I didn't eat the apple and I didn't authorize anyone else to eat it for me. So, not my bad.
To: ConsistentLibertarian
Then the question just morphs: Why does God blame little babies for something someone else did 10,000 (?) years ago that they had no control over? Same lump. Different swatch of the carpet. Actually I think you misunderstood me. If you had understood me you would have rather asked, "Why does G-d allow little babies to be born into this broken world?"
I'm going to let you into a little secret. G-d is much bigger than I am and I will never understand all of the whys. I focus, instead, on the what. In this case the question is, "What did G-d do about the broken world."
The answer is: He stretched out His arms on the Cross and offered Himself a sacrifice for the sins of the whole world.
Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners.
For G-d so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son to the end that all who believe in Him should not perish, but have eternal life.
G-d made the world perfect. G-d made man capable of choosing sin and then put man in the world. Man exercised his choice and sinned, and so broke the world. G-d fixed it at the price of His own life.
"Could it be that [G-d] would really rather die than live without us?" -Michael Card
Shalom.
19
posted on
09/17/2001 1:14:40 PM PDT
by
ArGee
To: RnMomof7
Scary, very, very scary.
According to Warren, God just sits back and lets us bash each other with no hope of His intervention. In other words, evil runs amuck and "heaven help" anyone in its way (except that "heaven" isn't going to "help").
This has to be seen as the logical result of an Arminian theology that grants man a form of "free-will" that not even God possesses.
20
posted on
09/17/2001 1:15:33 PM PDT
by
Jerry_M
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 401-410 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson