Posted on 09/09/2001 1:07:48 PM PDT by Ada Coddington
Although a formal betrothal like Casey and Kara's is rare even in conservative Christian circles some would consider their union extreme because of her youth many people are promoting a similar hand-before-heart approach they call courtship.
So, the age of the girl (14) and the six year age difference between her and the young man in question is a problem for many Christians, even conservative Christians, and it would be for me as a parent.
14 is simply too young for this kind of commitment, even with no sexual contact.
The girl may very well attempt to renege on this agreement/commitment when she's 18 or sometime before the scheduled marriage, which would not be surprising. Considering her tender age when she made the commitment, she should be allowed to cancel it at a more mature age. That's the folly of making a 'lifetime' commitment at 14, and the parents should not have let it go that far, this early. Still, the overall concept, if understood and agreed to by all parties and the young people are of a reasonable age (16 minimum and no 'lifetime commitments' before 18) is not a bad one.
I can't tell you what a strange notion I think this is. Holding hands usually reflects tenderness and some degree of emotional intimacy. It is not a sexual act.
How does that work?
The .3 is because one's on the way. Last time I saw his wife alone for a few minutes I asked her, "Is there something you are trying not to tell me?" She answered, "there is something my husband is trying not to tell you later tonight." It is so easy to tell on skinny women. :)
So.. You believe execution-style murder is the correct punishment for hand holding?
No wonder the robo-cops are getting away with blatant violations of our Constitution.
Uhh, In case you have forgotten, it IS a Bill of Rights, NOT a Bill of Privileges to be condoned when others agree with your beliefs of morality. Holding hands is a far cry from the bs that is currently enforced as FEDERAL LAW. Save your ammo for the correct target folks.
I'm Mormon, and I don't support it. We are stongly urged not to date in couples until the age of 16, at 14 we can start doing activities in groups. The young men are urged to wait to marry until after they have served their missions. And since we don't believe in premarital sex, the engagement is usually 3 to 6 months long. But not to date? My parents always said that you marry who you date. Dating naturally turns into courtship if there is interest on both side. I don't agree with this article.
Both of these statements applied to my late wife. I got engaged to her four months to the day after we first met in person, and we were married on the first Sunday over four months after that.
Not certain what that is supposed to mean, but as another person who was raised in the LDS church, I can assure that if I had gone to my parents at the tender age of 14, when my biggest concern in life was my crush on Mike McBride, and told them that God had told me that I was going to marry the said Mike McBride, they would have sat me down, asked me why I felt this way, discussed it with me, and then explained that at fourteen, I've still got a lot of living ahead of me, and that it's probably a little early to make decisions that are going to affect the rest of my life so much. (And then they would have gone to their room and laughed their heads off.)
Ten years later, at 24, I have no interest in the boys of my youth. I've discovered that I want different things in life than I previously thought. If you had asked a romantically inclined, slightly lonely fourteen year old if she wanted to spend the rest of her life with a handsome intelligent young man, and become betrothed right then and there, and then experience a strictly monitored courtship--I might have said yes. Now, this idea seems rather repulsive to me, and I can say that I'm glad my parents and the church I was raised in would never have countenanced such an absurdity.
As Utah Girl has pointed out, the Mormon church encourages its youth to date after their sixteenth birthdays. (At first in groups, and a few years later, more paired off.) The idea behind this is that you experience a wide range of personalities and get more of an idea about what traits your ideal partner should have.
I guess this is turning into more of a testament about being lucky to have the parents I do. They raised me to trust my own instincts and to do what I think best and to experience as much of life as possible before making any judgements that will tie me down. I'm no longer LDS and I've chosen to live with my partner before getting married; my sister chose to wait until her marriage after following the dating pattern I described above (ie a lot of dating after 16 and then exclusively dating her husband for a year and a half--she was 22 when she got married). They've got two daughters who approached their relationships with experience, and did things the way they thought was best. Not two girls who grew up helplessly sheltered and asked their opinion on who to marry and how to court.
I'm done rambling now. (Sorry this is so much later. Just found the article, had to comment.)
If I had married the girl I was interested in when I was 14... I can't even begin to describe how horrific my life would be. Not having any life experience to draw upon my criteria for an ideal mate were shallow and uninformed, to say the least.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.