Posted on 09/28/2025 8:35:14 PM PDT by lasereye
I expect a bunch of logically irrelevant comments about what a despicable corrupt person Comey is, Republicans never fight back etc.
So, the DOJ brought the wrong charge is what he is saying. There is MUCH that Comey has to answer for, and it would be a blunder to start out losing on this one.
May you get what you expect.
So what’s your point?
Even if Comey is acquitted, it will not happen until well after Trump is gone, and in the mean time it costs Comey millions to defend himself. They need to understand that lawfare can go both ways.
To make your long story short, I think we need to wait to see what the Feds have on the case before declaring the case over .
I’m led to believe other charges could / will be added, but this initial indictment was filed as a placeholder to extend state of limitations.
To make a long story short, Comey will be acquitted, if it goes to trial. Unless a third person was aware of a conversation between McCabe and Comey and has never told a soul about it all this time. Which is extremely unlikely.
=================================================..maybw no.
We have already found that capable lawyers sometimes produce incredible results;
Suppose that this is another of Trump’s “blunders” that is instead one of his traps. Comey, wo is confident that he is the smartest guy in the world, gets so cocky that he blabs a name or an event that widens the investigation? Actually Comey is not home free because he has yet to complete many more personal interviews and interrogations
There are many opportunities to get to the truth.....and to the jail.
e
Seems as if the acts (or culpable inactions) by Comey referred to in any future charges still need to be within the timeframe specified by the applicable Statute of Limitations.
Not sure filing initial charges can serve to “toll” or pause the deadline with respect to future charges. But then again, not experienced in such things and will tend to defer to whoever is, and can explain how it might work. Such that new charges lodged in the future won’t necessarily be declared invalid.
Seems as if the acts (or culpable inactions) by Comey referred to in any future charges still need to be within the timeframe specified by the applicable Statute of Limitations.
Not sure filing initial charges can serve to “toll” or pause the deadline with respect to future charges. But then again, not experienced in such things and will tend to defer to whoever is, and can explain how it might work. Such that new charges lodged in the future won’t necessarily be declared invalid.
Nobody has any idea what the precise charges are or what the evidence is Wait and see is a good idea
Andrew McCarthy often believes his precious DOJ/FBI can do no wrong. In the past couple of years, when it comes to Trump and his administration, he has been wrong on his prognostications just as often as he has been right. He is often blinded by TDS but those such as Hindraker take his word as gospel.
Andy McCarthy ALWAYS sides with the Deep State
A third person is mentioned in the indictment but not named...yet
I think this is a stupid move that will actually boost Comey. I thought that should be obvious.
I think this is a stupid move that will actually boost Comey. I thought that should be obvious.
Another Bondi haters with their head up their a**
Take it up with the Big Guy, Nancy
I don't want to seem picky, but I don't know what it means to often believe someone can do no wrong. Either he always believes they can do no wrong or he doesn't.
Have you actually read what he's said over the years?
Andrew McCarthy: How long has Mueller known there was no Trump-Russia collusion?
Also, why is a legal analysis about siding with someone?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.