Posted on 08/27/2025 6:51:05 AM PDT by karpov
Jackson was 100% right. I always thought this is the reason Trump put Pres.Jackson front and center in the oval office. (at least I hoped so)
The Cook criminal referral is intended to fire Ms. Cook “for cause,” b/c the flawed Biden hire should not have been appointed at all. Mr. Trump provides “sufficient reason” to believe Cook exhibits the sort of “gross negligence” in financial transactions that calls into question her competence and trustworthiness as a financial regulator.
Claims regarding Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook’s flawed
academic background and qualifications have centered on two areas:
<><>Challenges to her qualifications: During her 2022 Senate confirmation, Republican lawmakers questioned her suitability for the role. Senator Pat Toomey claimed Cook lacked sufficient expertise in monetary economics to serve on the Fed. He asserted that a significant portion of her work at Michigan State University was in international relations rather than economics.
<><>Criticism of her research: Some of Cook’s research, which examines economic inequality and the historical impact of discrimination, drew criticism during her confirmation.
ACritics have claimed her research on topics like racial violence and its effect on Black innovation is ideologically driven rather than sound economics. Christopher Rufo, audited her writings in August 2025 and suggested she was careless with her work.
The focus on Cook’s background has resurfaced in 2025. In late August 2025, Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), Bill Pulte, accused Cook of mortgage fraud, claiming she improperly designated two homes as “primary residences” to get better interest rates. The Trump administration has cited these as “cause” to fire her from the Federal Reserve Board.
Cook has denied any wrongdoing and is suing the administration,
arguing that the attempt to fire her is an illegal and politically motivated.
what is a “reasonable amount” for a fabricated crime?
“Mr. Trump”
It’s “President Trump”. Kind of like “President Obama” or “President Bush”. Is that so hard?
I’m reluctant to read articles by writers that can’t manage to refer to our President by his legitimate title.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.