Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The White House Announces White House Ballroom Construction to Begin
Whitehouse.gov ^ | 07 31 2025 | Whitehouse

Posted on 07/31/2025 4:30:15 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: yesthatjallen

“We’re going to build a big beautiful ballroom and Mexico is going to pay for it!” ...Oh, wait.


41 posted on 07/31/2025 5:27:09 PM PDT by know.your.why
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Related article

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4331922/posts


42 posted on 07/31/2025 5:31:09 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

You mean like it did up until now?


43 posted on 07/31/2025 5:31:37 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The White House grounds has always been modest and American. We don’t need a ballroom to celebrate .gov and other world leaders. A ballroom at the White House is the last thing we need.


44 posted on 07/31/2025 5:31:43 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Many high schools have spaces capable of seating 600. There is a point in being able to host larger get togethers.


45 posted on 07/31/2025 5:32:20 PM PDT by Hieronymus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

There isn’t yet and never has been, but there will be in the future.


46 posted on 07/31/2025 5:33:17 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

MORE PICTURES AT WHITEHOUSE.GOV

https://www.whitehouse.gov/visit/


Thanks for the link!


47 posted on 07/31/2025 5:37:55 PM PDT by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

If the article is correct, and they have been and are using a tent, then there has been and is.


48 posted on 07/31/2025 5:38:18 PM PDT by Hieronymus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I kind of agree with you. Anything that smacks of European royalty is not good for the American spirit.

That includes naming places after politicians, ornate ceremonies complete with trumpets, and yes…fancy ballrooms.

Or as Rosemary Clooney sang, “Give Me the Simple Life”.


49 posted on 07/31/2025 5:39:50 PM PDT by Leaning Right (It's morning in America. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
I kind of agree with you. Anything that smacks of European royalty is not good for the American spirit.

I liked Queen Elizabeth II.

Others? They're a bunch of actors.

50 posted on 07/31/2025 5:41:01 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; shelterguy

Some people are never, ever happy with what pres Trump does at work-all they see is doom, gloom and probable nefarious deeds by him, his staff and cabinet members-even when he and some donors are paying for building a needed addition to enhance the capacity of the WH to entertain dignitaries-with THEIR own money-not ours. When was the last time any dem-or Rino for that matter-spent their own money on something for OUR WH?

I’m tempted to start selling black crepe paper to the doomers on these threads-they can hang it on the positive pres Trump threads instead of just complaining...


51 posted on 07/31/2025 5:41:58 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

Now they will be able to seat 650 instead of 200.


52 posted on 07/31/2025 5:42:23 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

And after that, let’s build on a conference center or ..another ballroom to the Alamo


53 posted on 07/31/2025 5:44:50 PM PDT by LibertyWoman (Turns out, all we needed was a new President...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IIKE9p5SEw&list=RD-IIKE9p5SEw&start_radio=1


54 posted on 07/31/2025 5:48:52 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

> I liked Queen Elizabeth II. <

Me too. She was a class act.

But yet she failed in her prime duty, protecting her country. Elizabeth said and did nothing (publicly at least) as hordes of Muslim immigrants overran her country.

I get that the British monarch reigns, but does not rule. I also get that Elizabeth was from another generation, and perhaps did not understand the danger.

Because of all that, I don’t blame her much. But she was on the wrong side of history on this one.


55 posted on 07/31/2025 5:51:42 PM PDT by Leaning Right (It's morning in America. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LibertyWoman

Discotheque for the Alamo.


56 posted on 07/31/2025 5:52:44 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

LMAO!


57 posted on 07/31/2025 5:55:22 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
But yet she failed in her prime duty, protecting her country. Elizabeth said and did nothing (publicly at least) as hordes of Muslim immigrants overran her country.

Looking back, she had the political influence to be outspoken.

People would listen if she had something to say.

58 posted on 07/31/2025 5:56:36 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

They already could seat 200 inside-—for more than 200 they were using a tent.


59 posted on 07/31/2025 5:57:14 PM PDT by Hieronymus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

Read the article.As for cost, Air Force one costs 10x that amount.


60 posted on 07/31/2025 5:57:42 PM PDT by Cobra64 (ECommon sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson