Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ghislaine Maxwell faces 'do or die' moment in court as US Government seeks to block retrial bid
Daily Mail ^ | 07/13/2025 | Caroline Graham

Posted on 07/13/2025 11:59:48 AM PDT by Drew68

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Kazan

“If not, she should be released and compensated. If there are, the men that committed the rapes absolutely need to be pursued, charged and convicted.”

The one she trafficked for was sent to jail.


21 posted on 07/13/2025 12:42:32 PM PDT by TexasGator (1i.. logo About Issues Projects Products Connect Subscribe Invest June 19, 2025 | Insight '1-1111 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Newbomb Turk
I find it interesting that she is in jail for sex trafficing minors but evidently there were no customers. Per the FBI and Pam Bondi. Feel free to school me on the situation.

Much more fun to point out your refusal to educate yourself first before commenting. Hell, the reason she is in jail has been posted in this very thread, and you're apparently too lazy to read what's already been spoon fed to you.

So I much prefer to let people like you who don't bother informing yourselves before commenting expose yourself. Separates the wheat from the chaff in terms of who is worth conversing with.

22 posted on 07/13/2025 12:48:06 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bobrlbob

Exactly.


23 posted on 07/13/2025 12:52:08 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Could be my imagination, but it sounds like there's a LIST.

.


SNIP

https://abcnews.go.com/US/federal-judge-orders-documents-naming-jeffrey-epsteins-associates/story?id=105779882

24 posted on 07/13/2025 1:04:17 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

Yes...and already public.


25 posted on 07/13/2025 1:12:49 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Do you have a link for it?


26 posted on 07/13/2025 1:15:00 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative
You’re entitled to your opinion, as I am mine.

When the reason she is in prison is publicly available and easily accessible, and someone asks why she is in jail as if that is a profound question, that fits perfectly this definition:

Ignorance: the state or fact of being ignorant : lack of knowledge, education, or awareness.

You clearly lack knowledge and awareness regarding the specific subject on which you are commenting.

27 posted on 07/13/2025 1:19:28 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner
It was published by the court in early January of 2024 I can't link the actual court documents (they are publicly accessible though), but there were tons of articles at the time discussing it. Here's the first that popped up for me.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/03/jeffrey-epstein-list-names-released

28 posted on 07/13/2025 1:34:45 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
I guess we'll have to leave it at this for now.

.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/epstein-records-possible-release/

29 posted on 07/13/2025 2:14:48 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I suspect it’s a done deal.

Trump will pardon her on his last day in office as a favor to his best bud Bibi.

She will spend the rest of her days in Israel.


30 posted on 07/13/2025 2:25:37 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Why don’t you quit insulting people and list you reference. People ridiculing others is, in my opinion, driving people away from FR.


31 posted on 07/13/2025 7:32:27 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1
Why don’t you quit insulting people and list you reference. People ridiculing others is, in my opinion, driving people away from FR.

So you think the people who post ridiculous theories because they haven't bothered to do any basic fact-checking at all aren't the problem.

You think the problem is the posters who call them out for doing so.

Here's an idea - rather than ask me to explain why Maxwell is in prison without a client list, why don't you do what I did and just look it up for yourself?

32 posted on 07/13/2025 8:26:31 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
You haven't even bothered to take the minimal effort to look up for what she was convicted - not even the basic Wikipedia article.

You mean this?

She was found guilty of child sex trafficking and other offences in connection with the deceased financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2021

So you want to us to believe she was trafficking underage girls but there aren't men that visit Epstein island that aren't guilty of raping them that should be pursued by the FBI, Bondi and the DOJ?

I have no idea why you think that proves your point.

33 posted on 07/13/2025 8:28:09 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
So you want to us to believe she was trafficking underage girls but there aren't men that visit Epstein island that aren't guilty of raping them that should be pursued by the FBI, Bondi and the DOJ? I have no idea why you think that proves your point.

Because she was convicted of trafficking four girls to be abused by Epstein. Not anyone else. The abuse occured in Epstein's personal residences in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/ghislaine-maxwell-sentenced-20-years-prison-conspiring-jeffrey-epstein-sexually-abuse

So why would the absence of a so-called "client list" mean Maxwell couldn't be convicted of procuring girls who were abused by Epstein himself?. It's a nonsensical argument that can be made only by people who didn't bother to learn anything about the trial on which they were commenting.

34 posted on 07/13/2025 8:50:47 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Because she was convicted of trafficking four girls to be abused by Epstein. Not anyone else.

Only an idiot would believe that she wasn't supplying underage girls to Epstein's visitors on Epstein island and elsewhere as well, including Bill Clinton.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/4/jeffrey-epstein-list-whose-names-are-on-the-newly-unsealed-documents

Included in the unsealed papers are the names of about 150 Epstein associates. The documents were filed as part of Virginia Giuffre’s 2015 defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s co-conspirator in his sexual abuse scheme. Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2022. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting sex trafficking charges.

Giuffre is one of the women who sued Epstein for abusing them at his homes in Florida, New York, the United States Virgin Islands and New Mexico. She said she was pressured into having sex with men in Epstein’s social orbit.

35 posted on 07/13/2025 9:03:24 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
So why would the absence of a so-called "client list" mean Maxwell couldn't be convicted of procuring girls who were abused by Epstein himself?

It's laughable if you actually believe the girls Maxwell was trafficking were only Epstein.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/jeffrey-epstein-prince-andrew-virginia-giuffre-prince-andrew-had-underage-orgy-on-private-island-jeffrey-epstein-files-claim-4809180

The documents stem from a 2015 civil suit by Virginia Giuffre, who says she was one of the many young girls trafficked by Epstein and his partner, Ghislaine Maxwell.

In her suit against Prince Andrew, she claimed he was one of several powerful men to whom Epstein "lent" her for abuse.

36 posted on 07/13/2025 9:09:14 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I think people like you are a problem for FR, not your information or insight contribution but your scolding. Quit scolding. Try being positive. Bring people together instead of tearing them down and driving them away. I realize building up is harder than tearing down however, building is more rewarding.


37 posted on 07/14/2025 12:40:37 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

“Quit scolding. Try being positive. Bring people together instead of tearing them down and driving them away.”

Excellent post.


38 posted on 07/14/2025 12:45:13 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

It’s a good question.


39 posted on 07/14/2025 12:47:55 PM PDT by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson