Posted on 06/19/2025 10:22:12 AM PDT by DFG
I’d be banned if I said what I am thinking.
The comments at the site are brutal…..
What about Privacy Violations ?
“A Democratic mayor (Freddie O’Connell) is defending the public release of names of federal immigration officers involved in mass migrant round ups, claiming that the real concern isn’t their safety, but that masked agents are ‘whisking people’ away.”
Yet another case of “Tell me your gay without telling me your gay.” Tattling to cause trouble or even harm for others is one sign.
That douche Clay Travis constantly brags about “Nashvull.” It’s just another city infested with liberals.
Detain him for the duration of CWII.
From last year. Guess who gets a security detail...
https://x.com/freddieoconnell/status/1714979083732296027
And another Democrat kicks Homan in the nuts and gets away either it. Homan is a little bi!@#.
dont talk that way on this site
Check out the results from the last election...
Take a good look.
https://ballotpedia.org/Freddie_O%27Connell
The above explains a lot.
Something happens to one of those doxed ICE agents or their families, the mayor and the city will be paying out big time. Can’t believe they are that dumb.
Something happens to one of those doxed ICE agents or their families, the mayor and the city will be paying out big time. Can’t believe they are that dumb.
any ICE agent sustaining injury or harassment due to said doxing needs to sue the mayor for millions ... maybe even a class action claiming pain and suffering by the ICE agent’s families ..
He looks like that pajama boy from the “talk about health insurance at Thanksgiving” obamacare ad.
I guess you have to physically attack an ICE agent to be handcuffed and released an hour later. No wonder there are thousands of these ahoes ready to break the law. All they get is a commercial on the news and a crying session at the Congress.
Seems like obstruction of justice, one of the Dems favorite crimes to accuse Republicans of.
"Democrat mayor SMIRKS as he defends 'doxing' ICE agents"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
I surmise that the misguided (imo) mayor is clueless about the Constitution's Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, and their possible ramifications with respect to his pushback actions.
"Article I, Section 8' Clause 15 (1.8.15): To provide for calling forth the Militia [all emphases added] to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;"
"14th Amendment, Section 3: No person shall be a [all emphasis added] Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.