Posted on 02/26/2025 1:34:06 PM PST by joesbucks
I look forward to reading the final audit reports. Does anyone believe the times?
Assuming that (in the unlikely event) this article is actually true and accurate:
I wonder how many of those ‘Spending Cuts’ deleted are because some corrupt leftist judge somewhere proclaimed an injunction on them and there hasn’t been time to appeal the partisan judiciarchy.
Correct. But there was no verification of the contract amount? And it had to be pointed out by the Times?
More like joesucks.
No Lil Joey that not how it works.
I know you are a Dem and think the rules are for everyone else but you cannot demand a standard of perfection from DOGE and then fail, either yourself or your sources, to be perfect.
Oh oh, you made a spelling error, since your not perfect that “damages your brand” and discredits everything else you posted for ever.
Really want this to be the standard applied TO you as well as DOGE?
gaslight
So like instead of 50 billion it was “only” 39 billion?
“freeper” joesbucks ALWAYS attacks effective Republicans and conservatives.
Now we know for sure that Elon, Big Balls and DOGE are being effective.
N-O-W they’re crunching the numbers?
Where were these “knowledgeable” NYT journos when the demented
Biden government was spending us into a $37 trillion dollar hole?
No probing journo questions, “Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How,”
comprehensive information “to inform the public” were being asked of Biden.
He explained this.
Anyone can demand perfection from a government entity or their contractor’s. And should. Isn’t that why we’re at where we’re at?
Elon Musk has to be absolutely transparent on this one. There is no “quietly” doing anything after all the hard line talk about transparency to the people. So...what gives Elon? Is this fake news or what?
DOGE cuts only really matter if they “stick” in any new CR’s/budgets passed by Congress. DOGE Executive Branch only cuts are “minimal” in the total FedGov spending picture. (But still welcomed!)
Not looking good Congress/budget-wise:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/14/text
It’s the New York Times.
Fake News by definition.
US government spending has not slowed under Trump so far, data shows https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/content/ar-AA1zOYSD?ocid=sapphireappshare
Ever heard of the saying "The perfect is the enemy of the good?"
"Demanding perfection" is a fool's errand. Nobody plans for (or should expect) perfection. The best thing to do is plan for contingencies and leave time and budget for errors and unplanned encounters like bad data: erroneous entries, missing categorizations, duplicate entries, etc.
Assuming perfection and planning to it is a guarantee of failure.
Waiting for perfection before hitting the market will lose market share, because perfection never comes. You have to plan for "good enough" and then plan for "fix the errors" after release. That's classic IT.
-PJ
The msn.com article in post #56 is actually a Reuters [Rrhoiders] article.
Reuters received 9 million dollars from USAID.
Jason Lange, Andy Sullivan and Brad Heath of Reuters, who wrote this “news” article, have a dog in the fight. Just saying. :)
My buddy in our IT shop could break anyone's newly-finished program within a minute and a half.
Why wait until after release for him to get his hands on it?
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.