Posted on 09/16/2024 7:28:28 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Maybe it would help if the Secret Service stopped advancing buffoons just because they fit the right diversity profile. Like the total dimwit director, Kim Cheatle, who our clueless President promoted for no apparent reason other than she is a woman who promised to continue this foolhardy DEI agenda.
I find it curious that there have been zero gun control callouts re the ‘assault weapon’ in this attempt...
This secret service ‘need’ smacks of misdirection.
This f’er. The nerve of Biden.
The number of SS agents is not the problem. The problem is the number of SS agents assigned to President Trump, and their orders.
You would think they would be better shooters as well.
They fired shots at a guy and didn’t hit him?
How is that possible?
The USSS had a sniper team with eyes on the suspect and they didn’t take him out?
How is that possible?
Yeah lets double up the size of the agency like what was done with the FBI. Great idea to have a bunch of super powerful people sitting around with not much to do.
and just who is in charte of the secret service.
he is the vindictive SOB who denied RFK SS three times even after armed men were in his property and hotel with a fake police ID.
I’m sure there are a bunch of retired veterans who’d protect Trump for free.
(see https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2022/8/26/biden-student-loan-forgiveness)
Rather than unearned free stuff for ungrateful undergrads, why not use what's needed for extra candidate security and don't spend the rest, at all.
I lean more towards execution, by IMPALEMENT!
Yeah but there is a severe need for “eyes” in the sky apparently. Unless of course you could fly it. I know we have a door gunner around somewhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.