Posted on 08/22/2024 9:53:12 AM PDT by Heartlander
The 21st century Neo-marxist COMINTERN is in London and DC
Time to brush up on Nadset ala A Clockwork Orange.
Britain needs its own internal revolution.
Christians in Australia, Canada, Britain, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, will have to unite in order to repel:
- the Globalist Union of Socialist Administrative States
- the invasions by muslim “color revolutionaries”
- the depravity of “gender” experimentation
- the non-sense that politicians can control the:
a) height of the oceans
b) size of the “ozone hole”
c) the number and size of glaciers
d) the rotational speed of planet earth.
WIKI
Nadsat is a mode of speech used by the nadsat, members of the teen subculture in the novel A Clockwork Orange.
Burgess was a polyglot who loved language in all its forms. However, he realized that if he used contemporary slang, the novel would very quickly become dated, owing to the way in which teenage language is constantly changing. He was therefore forced to invent his own vocabulary, and to set the book in an imaginary future.
Russian influences play the biggest role in Nadsat. Most of those Russian-influenced words are slightly anglicized loan-words
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadsat
It may seem shocking that 21st century Britain is sliding into authoritarianism. But consider that the country’s heyday in the 19th & 20th centuries in Britain were something of an aberration in terms of personal freedom. That country’s history for the 16th-18th centuries was largely one of oppression. Let’s face it. Our Bill of Rights was largely a reaction to everything that the framers saw that was wrong with Britain in terms of lack of liberty (no freedom of religion, no right to bear arms, censorship, etc.).
The great replacement goes global.
Post/tape up blank sheets of paper and pieces or cardboard.
The globalists will get the message.
Too bad they have up thier guns.
In anticipation, the Church of England is considering abandoning the Triune God of the Christian religion.
WIKI
The Pistols Act 1903 was the first to place restrictions on the sale of firearms....anyone wishing to buy a pistol commercially merely had to purchase a licence on demand over the counter from a Post Office before doing so. In addition, it did not regulate private sales of such firearms.
The Firearms Act 1920 was partly spurred by fears of a possible surge in crime from the large number of firearms available following World War I and also fears of working-class unrest in this period. “An Act to amend the law relating to firearms and other weapons and ammunition”, its main stated aim was to enable the government to control the overseas arms trade and so fulfill its commitment to the 1919 Paris Arms Convention. The ongoing Anglo-Irish War may also have been a factor, as Britain and Ireland were at that time still in union with each other, and the Act also applied to Ireland. It required anyone wanting to purchase or possess a firearm or ammunition to obtain a firearm certificate. The certificate, which lasted for three years, specified not only the firearm but also the amount of ammunition the holder could buy or possess. Local chief constables decided who could obtain a certificate and had the power to exclude anyone of “intemperate habits” or “unsound mind”, or anyone considered “for any reason unfitted to be trusted with firearms”. Applicants for certificates also had to convince the police that they had a good reason for needing a certificate. The law did not affect smooth-bore guns, which were available for purchase without any form of paperwork. The penalty for violating the Act was a fine of up to £50 or “imprisonment with or without hard labour for a term not exceeding three months”, or both.
The Firearms Act 1937....raised the minimum age for buying a firearm or airgun from 14 to 17, extended controls to shotguns and other smooth-bore weapons with barrels shorter than 20 in (510 mm) (later raised by the Firearms Act 1968 to 24 in (610 mm)), transferred certificates for machine guns to military oversight, regulated gun dealers, and granted chief constables the power to add conditions to individual firearms certificates.
The same year, the Home Secretary declared that self-defence was no longer a suitable reason for applying for a firearm certificate and directed police to refuse such applications on the grounds that “firearms cannot be regarded as a suitable means of protection and may be a source of danger”.
The Firearms Act 1968 brought together all existing firearms legislation in a single statute. Disregarding minor changes, it formed the legal basis for British firearms control policy until the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988 was put through Parliament in the aftermath of the 1987 Hungerford massacre. For the first time, it introduced controls for long-barrelled shotguns, in the form of shotgun certificates that, like firearm certificates, were issued by an area’s chief constable in England, Scotland, and Wales. While applicants for firearms certificates had to show a good reason for possessing the firearm or ammunition, it did not apply to shotgun certificates. Firearms and ammunition had to be kept locked up in a secure place approved by the local police firearms officer.
The Act also prohibited the possession of firearms or ammunition by criminals who had been sentenced to imprisonment; those sentenced to three months to three years imprisonment were banned from possessing firearms or ammunition for five years, while those sentenced to longer terms were banned for life. However, an application could be made to have the prohibition removed.
The Act was accompanied by an amnesty; many older weapons were handed in to the police. It has remained a feature of British policing that from time to time a brief firearms amnesty is declared.
In the aftermath of the Hungerford massacre, Parliament passed the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988. This confined semi-automatic and pump-action centre-fire rifles, military weapons firing explosive ammunition, short shotguns that had magazines, and elevated both pump-action and self-loading rifles to the Prohibited category. Registration and secure storage of shotguns held on shotgun certificates became required, and shotguns with more than a 2+1 capacity came to need a firearm certificate. The law also introduced new restrictions on shotguns. Rifles in .22 rimfire and semi-automatic pistols were unaffected.
Following the Dunblane massacre, the government passed the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 and the Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1997, defining “short firearms” as Section 5 prohibited weapons, which effectively banned private possession of handguns almost completely in Great Britain. Exceptions to the ban include muzzle-loading guns, pistols of historic interest (such as pistols used in notable crimes, rare prototypes, unusual serial numbers, guns forming part of a collection), guns used for starting sporting events, signal pistols, pistols that are of particular aesthetic interest (such as engraved or jewelled guns), and shot pistols for pest control. Even the UK’s Olympic shooters fell under this ban....
The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world and mass shootings are extremely rare. There were 0.05 recorded intentional homicides committed with a firearm per 100,000 inhabitants in the five years to 2011 (15 to 38 people per year). Gun homicides accounted for 2.4% of all homicides in the year 2011.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearms_regulation_in_the_United_Kingdom
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Article 19
1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.
3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:
(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;
(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.
Article 20
1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/ccpr.pdf
The UK and USA are both state parties.
I think they might eventually have to use abridged Qurans in the UK.
Some people might not appreciate that.
Soviet Islamic Britain!
The bad part is not “Soviet”, the most dangerous part is “Islamic”...
It’s not Soviet Britain, it’s Islamic Britain.
Islam, Communisn and Facism all have the same goals;
Total world control
With one leader at the top
The English (at least the Protestants) had a right to bear arms, that’s where the colonists got it from.
There’s no England now.
The myth-building about the recent British riots grows more imaginative by the day. There were no such 'rival gangs of native Britons and Muslims clashing', and haven't been since the Bradford riots of 2001. The only protagonists this time were white Britons, quasi-organised through social media, and the police.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.