Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atheist who set out to prove the Shroud of Turin was fake reveals why he's now 'convinced' it's the cloth Jesus was buried in
Daily Mail UK ^ | 8-20-2024 | Stacy Liberatore

Posted on 08/21/2024 5:38:05 AM PDT by Gary from Dayton

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Ann Archy
Ann Archy @35: It's called FAITH!! NO ONE KNEW THE IMAGE OF JESUS WAS ON THE SHROUD UNTIL X-RAYS WERE INVENTED!

Nonsense!

First, X-rays were discovered, not invented!

Second, the image on the Shroud of Turin can be seen in an 1898 photograph by Secondo Pia, with no use of x-rays.


41 posted on 08/21/2024 7:57:44 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Being that vast resources and the entirety of the lefty press and scientific community have done everything in their power to disprove this artifact lends it overwhelming credence in my mind.

That's a good point.

42 posted on 08/21/2024 8:37:14 AM PDT by Captain Walker ("It is infinitely better to have a few good Men, than many indifferent ones." - George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“It’s just another religious scam”

That nobody can prove is a scam. That is why it interest me.


43 posted on 08/21/2024 8:39:46 AM PDT by Gary from Dayton (Army Vet 1986-1991 unburdened by what was burdening before )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gary from Dayton

While we may never know the real origins of the Shroud of Turin, all the analysis with the most modern methods haven’t demonstrated it to be a crude medieval fake or given any convincing explanation how the image was formed particularly with the technology of the reputed radio carbon dating of the 1300s.


44 posted on 08/21/2024 8:47:35 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Well what ever you do don’t try studying the face cloth too.

Seems they have many similar features yet took a much different path after their origins through history.


45 posted on 08/21/2024 9:40:58 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels ( Quit dreaming I'm told, never says the Broomstick Cowboy = All things are possible with God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Captain Walker

Real what? Really Jesus? Unless he comes back and claims it, that will never be proven.


46 posted on 08/21/2024 10:00:47 AM PDT by MTsumi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
Until one has all the available facts, uniformed opinion is worthless:

Welcome to the Shroud of Turin Website - SCROLL DOWN FOR MENU

47 posted on 08/21/2024 10:12:38 AM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion

ὀθονίων othoniōn

and the face-cloth which had been on His head, not lying with the
linen wrappings, but rolled up in a place by itself.

ὀθονίων othoniōn linen cloth
noun, genitive, *plural*, neuter
CDWGTHB bandage; linen clothes


48 posted on 08/21/2024 10:23:54 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
Correct. It doesn't say "strips". Everyone until the late 20th C translated it as "burial cloths" or "burial linens" or just "linens".

It doesn't preclude one of those "cloths" being a shroud that covered the whole body.

If you look up "Jewish burial customs second temple period," most sources seem to agree that there was a shroud, a "napkin" (Gr sudarion) covering the face, and linen bands (there's the "strips") with which the arms and legs were bound.

49 posted on 08/21/2024 10:41:16 AM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: raygunfan

In the Army we had to have name tapes on all our shirts. Thats the only way I remembered everyone’s name for the 1st week.


50 posted on 08/21/2024 10:54:40 AM PDT by Delta 21 (If anyone is treasonous, it is those who call me such.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Campion
It doesn't preclude one of those "cloths" being a shroud that covered the whole body.

And this is why I wrote, "The testimony of two Apostles is that they did not see a burial cloth."

To make that more clear...

The testimony of two Apostles does not specify a burial cloth.

51 posted on 08/21/2024 11:30:31 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Gary from Dayton

The Lord works in mysterious ways!


52 posted on 08/21/2024 11:34:01 AM PDT by liberalh8ter ( Ephesians 6:10 - 18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

You’re pretty miserly in your concession on the Pray Codex. C’mon now: the holes that exactly match burn holes on the shroud, the herringbone pattern of the cloth, Jesus nude when he was absolutely never portrayed in that way in art, hands over the privates, missing thumbs. It is literally unlike any other artistic representation of Christ down from the cross. I’ll propose the evidence that the codex depicts the shroud is true by clear and convincing evidence, I.e., “sufficiently strong to command the assent of every reasonable mind.” As I said before, my point is that the notion, repeated by another poster, that the shroud appeared out of nowhere in 1354 is simply false. Acknowledgement of its existence as depicted in the codex just before year 1200 also smokes the carbon-14 findings, since that’s well before the oldest date claimed in those findings

Me, I’ve read, I think, every major work on the shroud in English. I’m convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. As to others, I think an open-minded view of the entirety of the evidence is close to clear and convincing. At the very least, I could convince a jury in my sleep that the authenticity is supported by the preponderance of the evidence


53 posted on 08/21/2024 11:39:01 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (23 years on Free Republic, 12/10/23! More than 8,000 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

It specifies (when translated correctly) more than one burial cloth. So what’s your point? More than one means there was (at least) one.


54 posted on 08/21/2024 11:39:08 AM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Campion

No specified shroud in the text.

That’s what we know.

Separate face cloth

That’s what we know from the text.


55 posted on 08/21/2024 11:57:16 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Gary from Dayton; All
AI renditioon


56 posted on 08/21/2024 2:54:21 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
>Separate face cloth

Believers claim that is the Sudarian of Oviedo, the provenance of which goes back at least 7 centuries before the Shroud's public appearance in France. To the extent technology offers, its blood and the pattern of their stains, matches that on the Shroud.

57 posted on 08/21/2024 3:05:40 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (They don't care. We don't scare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

so how come one has proven it didn’t cover the body of the christ???


58 posted on 08/21/2024 3:52:12 PM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

Seems the shroud wouldn’t have a face image if they had the face cloth on


59 posted on 08/21/2024 5:23:27 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Ruh roh, Shaggy. Scripture?


60 posted on 08/21/2024 5:27:04 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson