Skip to comments.
Boeing grounds entire 777X test fleet after discovering engine defect
DAILY MAIL ^
| 20 August 2024
| Alex Hammer
Posted on 08/20/2024 1:09:12 PM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
08/20/2024 1:09:12 PM PDT
by
george76
To: george76
The headline says Boeing...
The problem is" The component in question, a titanium piece called a 'thrust link,' connects to the GE9X engines made by General Electric (GE)".
2
posted on
08/20/2024 1:13:34 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: george76
Does it say “Made in China” on the packaging??
Everything else is.
3
posted on
08/20/2024 1:14:26 PM PDT
by
coincheck
(Salvation is for today, not tomorrow, you might not make it that far.....)
To: george76
Give these kids a break... They're doing their best.
4
posted on
08/20/2024 1:18:04 PM PDT
by
jerod
(Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
To: george76
Numerologists most affected.
To: pfflier
Evidently that whole SPC and Six Sigma schtick shoved down GE’s throat by the illustrious McKinsey Group isn’t working out so well.
To: coincheck
Yeah, Chinesium isn’t a good metal.
To: pfflier
That diesn’t mean that GE (or Boeing) makes the part. GE is responsible for certification of the engine itself. Boeing is resposnible for the engine’s installation and interface construction.
Not enough data in the article to determine who is responsible.
8
posted on
08/20/2024 1:22:17 PM PDT
by
MortMan
(Charter member of AAAAA - American Association Against Alliteration Abuse)
To: george76
This latest 777X test fleet problem, along with the Boeing door opening problem, and the "modified limited hangout" regarding the problems/failures on the Starliner Stuckliner, hanging on the ISS, this doesn't seem like a local manufacturing issue, but a broader leadership problem in the top Boeing management.
To: george76
Well, if you don’t hire the best, then your company fails the test.
No cert for you.
5.56mm
10
posted on
08/20/2024 1:34:52 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
(Quid Pro Joe and the Ho have got to go. )
To: pfflier
How is that DEI working for GE?
11
posted on
08/20/2024 1:39:05 PM PDT
by
MtnClimber
(For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
To: george76
Boeing’s problems almost seem deliberate or sabotage. An excuse for the government to take over the company?
12
posted on
08/20/2024 1:46:15 PM PDT
by
ryderann
To: MtnClimber
Funny how the most single-minded unaccepting people in the world use the words ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’ so frequently. They don’t accept ANY diversity of thought. They don’t like people with southern accents. They don’t like non-college educated whites. They don’t like conservative minorities. They call the middle of the nation ‘fly over country’. And, they don’t respect and won’t tolerate anyone thinking anything that doesn’t agree with their world view.
To: ryderann
An excuse for the government to take over the company? That would lead to the most unsafe planes in the skies.
To: neverevergiveup
I hope Boeing dies on the vine SCREW THEM!!
To: neverevergiveup
Great description.
To: pfflier
The problem is" The component in question, a titanium piece called a 'thrust link,' connects to the GE9X engines made by General Electric (GE)".
Not a problem. Pratt & Whitney, GE (and Rolls-Royce) makes engines. Boeing makes the plane. Think of those MOPAR trucks with Cummins diesel engines, or the Taurus SHO with the Yamaha engine.
17
posted on
08/20/2024 2:23:39 PM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
To: Trump Girl Kit Cat
“I hope Boeing dies on the vine SCREW THEM!!”
The anti-American globalists who have Boeing (and ultimately all of America) in their crosshairs share your sentiment.
I, for one, hope that Boeing gets their act together and pulls themselves (and the USA) out of this nosedive.
However, this issue isn’t Boeing it’s on GE.
18
posted on
08/20/2024 2:36:49 PM PDT
by
Gary from Dayton
(Army Vet 1986-1991 unburdened by what was burdening before )
To: pfflier
“The headline says Boeing...”
The headline always blames Boeing. In most cases it’s the operating airline that is responsible. In this case a GE part.
19
posted on
08/20/2024 2:39:58 PM PDT
by
Gary from Dayton
(Army Vet 1986-1991 unburdened by what was burdening before )
To: Gary from Dayton
However, this issue isn’t Boeing it’s on GE. No. It's Boeing's plane. They are responsible to make sure their suppliers have quality systems in place to preclude such problems. Further, Boeing would have to have incoming inspection systems to validate supplier quality. Validation systems like that overlap for a reason.
20
posted on
08/20/2024 2:45:23 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson