Posted on 07/15/2024 5:36:08 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
He is not related to Pelosi. That is a myth.
BS law- it is taking rights away from the parents- take it to the supreme court-
I predict that eventually one of these evil bastards will help a kid mutilate himself, and one of the parents will kill or mutilate the ‘teacher’. I would applaud.
Sick
"A recent poll by Rasmussen found that an overwhelming majority of California voters support parental notification policies. However, Democrats hold supermajorities in both houses of the state legislature and are able to ignore the will of the majority of California voters on this issue [??? emphasis added], which is important to the left-wing LGBTQ+ movement."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
There are two MAJOR constitutional problems with this California law imo.
First, Mark 7:7-13, particularly verse 13, shows that Jesus taught that not even religious leaders have the right to interfere with parental authority, radical California lawmakers now wrongly interfering with the "Honor your Father and Mother Commandment" by doing so imo.
On the other hand, it is arguably good that parental rights are not expressly mentioned in the Constitution because some “parents” don't deserve to be parents imo.
So for Californians who value their freedoms of religious expression and speech, this California law is a violation of 1st Amendment (1A) applied to the states by the 14th Amendment (14A) imo.
Excerpted from 14A:
"Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
The problem with 14A in this example is that Democratic and Republican Trump supporters must first support hopeful Trump 47 with a new Constitution-respecting Congress in November, not only so that he won't be a lame duck president from the first day of his 2nd term, the new Congress also doing its duty to make 14A-based penal laws that discourage the states from abridging constitutionally enumerated protections.
In fact, Christians should be encouraged that 14A is still alive and kicking, even in California.
UC Berkeley settles landmark free speech lawsuit, will pay $70,000 to conservative group (12.4.18)
Note that I wouldn't be surprised if California taxpayers ultimately paid the settlement above, completely defeating the main purpose of Section 1 of 14A if so imo.
Also, it doesn't matter if oppressed California parents are not majority voters since constitutionally enumerated protections work even for one person.
Another challenge for Trump's new Congress is that lawmakers also need to do their constitutionally enumerated duty to guarantee citizens that their voices will be heard by their state governments.
"Article IV, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government [emphasis added], and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
These bat-crap crazy fools think they can legally do this? In the USA? I understand it’s will be law (temporarily) but even the dimmest of bulbs can see this doesn’t pass the sniff test.
I am of the opinion that Mail-in fraud was perfected in Kalifornia and went nationwide in 2020.
Greatest unwitting proponent of homeschooling ever!
Yup...was probably used and perfected in democratic primaries to get Biden nominated...remember all the delayed voting results in the democratic primaries in 2019 and 2020?
Exactly.
Newsom’s wife sells a sex book to schools. If they do not buy then her husband the gov will stop the schools from getting money.
This excuse has been used by the pro-abortion crowd for decades. However, any child who is in danger because of gender, is probably ALREADY in danger and being abused for other 'reasons.' Child abuse is against the law and truly abused children need protection, not secrecy.
Exactly; does that mean that I can identify as black after all I’m 13% black according to ancestry.com.
He’s got to enshrine that wickedness before the elections—get it in under the wire. How many kids can he ruin for life?
But who’s keeping score. Not the floods of people leaving California...
“...an overwhelming majority of California voters support parental notification policies. However, Democrats hold supermajorities in both houses of the state legislature...”
Is anyone else seeing how this statement makes no sense at all?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.