Skip to comments.
The U.S. Navy's New Ford-Class: The Worst Aircraft Carrier Ever
The National Interest ^
| 7/9/24
| Brandon Weichart
Posted on 07/10/2024 7:28:14 AM PDT by hardspunned
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
I’ve been saying most of this for years.
To: hardspunned
So, they are clumsy, like Ford?
2
posted on
07/10/2024 7:31:41 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: hardspunned
“The Worst Aircraft Carrier Ever”
Was Keith Olberman involved in this evaluation?
3
posted on
07/10/2024 7:32:41 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: hardspunned
We are lucky that our aircraft carriers have not come under direct attack since World War II. The $10 billion cost doesn’t include the fleet of ships that surround them either.
4
posted on
07/10/2024 7:36:15 AM PDT
by
Reno89519
(I'll go out on a limb: Trump & Gabbard 2024 or Trump & Sanders 2024)
To: hardspunned
I’m not surprised, really. I don’t think good military aircraft are capable of being built in the US anymore. Look at the KC-46 boondoogle.
5
posted on
07/10/2024 7:37:54 AM PDT
by
ducttape45
(Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
To: ConservativeMind
So, they are clumsy, like Ford?
One little slip on a stairway and SNL turned an All-America football player into a clumsy dork. Biden is so clumsy he needs help taking a couple off a stage...crickets.
6
posted on
07/10/2024 7:39:52 AM PDT
by
hanamizu
( )
To: hardspunned
The third extension in December kept Ford out through the holiday season. The carrier was at sea for 239 days, according to the Navy.
“The Ford crew conducted 33,444 flight deck moves, 3,124 hangar bay aircraft moves, 2,883 aircraft elevator moves, 16,351 aircraft fueling evolutions, and transferred 8,850 pallets of cargo and mail,” the Navy said in the release.
https://news.usni.org/2024/01/17/uss-gerald-r-ford-arrives-home-from-maiden-deployment-after-3-extensions
To: hardspunned
The future carrier could be a nuke-powered space-based platform, sending out numerous
capacitor laser drones, which return to the carrier as needed for replenishment.
Of course, for the US, this presumes it is worthy of victory seeing that the majority are at war with God.
8
posted on
07/10/2024 7:41:24 AM PDT
by
daniel1212
(Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
To: hardspunned
Go back to conventional CVs. Build two for the price of one and crew training is easier. Tell me damage control is not easier on a conventional ship as opposed to an exotic nuclear one. Go on, try to tell me that whopper.
9
posted on
07/10/2024 7:44:14 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: hardspunned
The author seems overly opinionated, and far from a flat-top aficionado.
If carriers were bad things, why would our presumptive foes be building them?
10
posted on
07/10/2024 7:46:32 AM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never...in nothing, great or small...Winston ChurchIill)
To: Seaplaner
11
posted on
07/10/2024 7:51:08 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: hardspunned
Was there something wrong with the Nimitz class where retrofitting was impractical? Inquiring minds want to know.
12
posted on
07/10/2024 7:51:47 AM PDT
by
LastDayz
(A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
To: hardspunned
Look at the bright side...The crew’s quarters are surely very commodious for both sexes and their various permutations.
13
posted on
07/10/2024 7:52:58 AM PDT
by
PerConPat
(The politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.- Mencken)
To: Seaplaner
Who else is building one $13Billion carrier, let alone TEN?
14
posted on
07/10/2024 7:53:11 AM PDT
by
hardspunned
(Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
To: hardspunned
15
posted on
07/10/2024 7:54:30 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: hardspunned
In “modern warfare” they’d be on the bottom.
16
posted on
07/10/2024 7:56:27 AM PDT
by
VTenigma
(Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
To: LastDayz
With the proliferation of missile technology even the Houthis are on the verge of having carrier killing missiles. ALL carriers in a near peer conflict with the U.S. are completely vulnerable. The Japanese in 1945 demonstrated the danger. Kamikazes were no more than manned cruise missiles. Had the Japanese started massively using Kamikaze methods in 1943, they would have stopped the USN cold.
17
posted on
07/10/2024 8:01:02 AM PDT
by
hardspunned
(Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
To: hardspunned
We need hybrid subs that can launch thousands of killer drones.
To: ConservativeMind
No, the Ford class carriers suffer from being designed and supervised in construction by the Navy Bureau of Ships, a chronically inept element of the US Navy's bureaucracy. The problem there is rooted in the curriculum and cadet selection at the US Naval Academy at Annapolis and its weaknesses in science and naval engineering.
In addition, the US shipbuilding industry is in dire condition due to foreign competition and the decline of the US Merchant Marine. This leads to a relatively thin pool of American technical and supervisory talent needed for the design and construction of capable naval vessels on time and on budget.
To: hardspunned
The “carrier” of the future..
Is likely to be a sub that spits out tons of small single use drones or VTOL predator type missile/ bomber platforms.
Hell.. the sub itself could be a remote controlled “drone”..
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson