Skip to comments.
DEI efforts in US Armed Forces ineffective, run ‘opposite of the military ethos’: study
New York Post ^
| July 1, 2024
| Cameron Arcand
Posted on 07/02/2024 12:56:07 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: MinorityRepublican
How about that Miley ya worthless F.
21
posted on
07/02/2024 6:16:24 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(Kimber .45 Be Kind.)
To: BerryDingle
“Sounds like my old mandatory race relations classes back in the early 70’s in the Army. All whites are racist, even if we’ve never heard of it before.”
In the 80s and 90s it was blacks AND women. All white males were racists, misogynists, and sexual harassers.
22
posted on
07/02/2024 6:37:19 AM PDT
by
suthener
( )
To: Bookshelf
Reading what you posted absolutely makes my blood boil.
And the thing that bothers me most, these people responsible for this will never, ever be called to account for it.
When we get into a conflict with an enemy who is close to a peer to peer Capability with us and we get our clock cleaned, none of these people will be around to answer for it. They’ll all be rich and gone somewhere.
23
posted on
07/02/2024 7:43:44 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
To: MinorityRepublican
“The massive DEI bureaucracy, its training and its pseudo-scientific assessments are at best distractions that absorb valuable time and resources,” the executive summary states. “At worst they communicate the opposite of the military ethos: e.g. that individual demographic differences come before team and mission.” Nice to see what all sane people already know confirmed by a scientific study.
24
posted on
07/02/2024 7:45:46 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: pepsionice
you’d have to first probably cut over 10k ranking officers because they can’t perform at the level required. And you'd have a much better performing force just by cutting away a lot of dead wood in the upper ranks. Removing them would NOT be a detriment to military readiness.
25
posted on
07/02/2024 7:47:13 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: MinorityRepublican
Obviously, THIS is not who we are.
26
posted on
07/02/2024 8:30:12 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(If anyone is treasonous, it is those who call me such.)
To: Delta 21
Obviously, THIS is not who we are.
To: Jess Kitting
A “woke” military would run like cowards the minute they were challenged. Loyalty to the regime would be the last thing on their minds.
You can partially get around that by selectively applying its standards. As an outgrowth of Marxism, a properly run DEI program has no qualms about favoritism guiding its enforcement, or being logically inconsistent - those are strengths. Yes, it will eventually tear down the entire institution, but before that, it will take aim at certain enemies.
28
posted on
07/02/2024 4:39:50 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson