Posted on 06/25/2024 10:48:52 PM PDT by imardmd1
Rules are for other people.....I do not ask permission for a God given RIGHT.
Well the first thing if I were a Citizen of Delaware go after Biden and the Governor...just saying..
I noticed that the Illinois firearms owners permit has really slowed down murders in Chicago, East St. Louis, Peoria, etc.
Missouri had this exact law post 1968, except there was a very restrictive permit to carry. It was done away with because the bad guys knew their victims were most likely unarmed but they could still get guns.
“47 fewer firearm homicides and 103 fewer firearm suicides over the first 10 years of implementation”
Junk science.
INFRINGE
“intransitive verb To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate.
intransitive verb Obsolete To defeat; invalidate.
intransitive verb To encroach on someone or something; engage in trespassing.
from The Century Dictionary.
To commit a breach or infraction of; act contrary to, as a law, right, or obligation; transgress, either by action or by negligence; violate; break.
To annul or hinder.
To encroach; trespass; intrude: followed by on or upon: as, to infringe upon one’s rights.”
FRINGE
“something that is marginal, additional,
or secondary to some activity, process, or subject”
There is absolutely NO WAY that they can prove those statistics! It’s all a lie!
In prefix
“Meaning “Not”
The prefix “in-” can also mean “not”
or “opposite of.” For example:
Insane: not sane or rational
Invalid: not valid or effective
Indifferent: not caring or concerned.
I split these up on purpose.
“Research”. 😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣😂🤣😂
The figures may well be analytically correct as far as they go, but the key point in the real world is that rates of robbery, burglary, home invasion, and personal violence go down when firearms are readily available to the general public. Adding in cost, complexity, and delay for firearm purchases helps criminals by burdening the ability of the public to protect themselves.
This prove your can manufacture “research” to show anything you want.
Would never have wanted to live there anyway.
the research of today is not based on the true numbers of incidents in any particular field of study but on what numbers sound best to the general public in order to elicit a forgone and planned conclusion in the minds of the people. “If it SOUNDS good, it must be true” applies.
“firearms” versus “handguns”...
Conflation is the left’s stock in trade...
How the hell does one get live firearms training if you can’t buy the gun first? Do you go rent a pistol at the training center (probably a cheap .22) get the training and fire the gun? Then you go to the gun store and can now buy say an AR-15? Just wondering...
Every gun law is touted as the ultimate response to firearm violence for 5 minutes, then it’s not. Gun laws are about two things: punishing people who believe in the 2A, and the goal of taking everyone’s firearms away from them. The second objective is absolutely impossible.
“47 fewer firearm homicides and 103 fewer firearm suicides over the first 10 years of implementation”
Junk science.
———————
Now, how many more murders, burglaries, rapes nd robberies would have occurred because of the law?
I unfortunately live in Connecticut. We have every gun law they can think of and it doesn’t do a damn bit of good. Every night on the local news it’s a shooting in Hartford or New Haven or Bridgeport etc. And yes Boo boo, it is them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.