Skip to comments.
Breaking! Judge Merchan rules Trump not allowed to attend the historic PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY argument in front of The United States Supreme Court, on Thursday, April 25th
Donald J. Trump Truth Social ^
| April 15, 2024
| Donald J. Trump
Posted on 04/15/2024 6:24:50 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 221-230 next last
To: Fuzz
It’s probably better you don’t just throw irrelevant terms out there. Due process doesn’t apply in this instance. It's probably better you post less. You're not that bright.
To: cowboyusa
I saw that
He’s been on the go non-stop. He needs a break.
82
posted on
04/15/2024 8:15:23 PM PDT
by
Macho MAGA Man
(The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
To: John S Mosby
A well reasoned and dispassionate reply that addresses the issue succinctly.
Well done.
83
posted on
04/15/2024 8:15:50 PM PDT
by
Fuzz
To: coalminersson
yes and it is the client who filed the case so I would think they would have the right to be there Thomas should order trump’s presence.Yup.
To: FreeReign
‘You’re not that bright.’
I’m aware.
85
posted on
04/15/2024 8:16:59 PM PDT
by
Fuzz
To: Beowulf9
On what grounds can a father not go to his sons graduation ceremony?
On the grounds that a judge ordered him to be in court for his criminal trial. Right or wrong, the judge can do that.
To: Macho MAGA Man
I think he was mocking them, like, this is not worth my energy. And it went right over thier heads. They don’t scare him.
87
posted on
04/15/2024 8:18:17 PM PDT
by
cowboyusa
(YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
To: Colorado Doug
Barron is being deprived of what and by whom?
88
posted on
04/15/2024 8:18:37 PM PDT
by
Fuzz
To: Colorado Doug
This is an excellent point.
The timing could not be better. What's happening in New York City today is exactly what future Presidents should fear when making executive decisions in a divided government.
If there are no limits on what a corrupt city burough DA could do, like taking a federal charge he can't prosecute to revive a misdemeanor charge he can't prosecute, and then harass the leading opposition candidate to interfere with his election campaign, then there should be no limits on Presidential immunities to prevent it from happening again.
The Bragg case itself wouldn't be affected by Presidential immunity (Trump wasn't President when the payments were supposedly made), but the behaviors of the Attorneys General, District Attorneys, federal investigators, and trial judges generally need to be reined in when dealing with decisions that Presidents made while still in office.
-PJ
89
posted on
04/15/2024 8:22:24 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Political Junkie Too
Trump is not being charged for crimes related to executive decisions.
90
posted on
04/15/2024 8:24:09 PM PDT
by
Fuzz
To: woodpusher
Yeah but who is to say that trial date will be the same as his son’s graduation. I mean is it?
91
posted on
04/15/2024 8:24:59 PM PDT
by
Beowulf9
To: Fuzz
Did you read my final paragraph?
-PJ
92
posted on
04/15/2024 8:25:28 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: odawg
Complete lie. Not surprised.
93
posted on
04/15/2024 8:26:53 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(DeSantis is a beast! Florida is the freest state in the country! )
To: Fuzz
I wasn't talking about the Bragg case, I was talking about the immunity case.
I was talking about how the behaviors exhibited by the players in this case would be repeated by prosecutors in other cases if the boundaries of immunity are defined too narrowly.
-PJ
94
posted on
04/15/2024 8:27:58 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Fuzz
He’s cheated on every wife. Even grabbed women by the p***sy and moved on them like a bitch. Pretty bold or should I say foolish statements to make without proof.
95
posted on
04/15/2024 8:28:40 PM PDT
by
Colorado Doug
(Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
To: Political Junkie Too
96
posted on
04/15/2024 8:29:32 PM PDT
by
Fuzz
To: Fuzz
Then you missed the point.
I was actually taking your side on the argument about Trump attending SCOTUS, but you're too blinded to see that.
-PJ
97
posted on
04/15/2024 8:32:00 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Fuzz
Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... trial my arse... more like a kangaroo court with clowns and monkeys. Have yet to figure out whether you’re a clown or monkey. Prolly a little of both, I suspect.
98
posted on
04/15/2024 8:33:09 PM PDT
by
LastDayz
(A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
To: Fuzz
Third, if Barron means so much to him, maybe don’t boink a porn actress when your wife just gave birth to the kid.FO.
To: Fuzz
You’re on the wrong forum. I guess you haven’t seen the statement where the “actress” in question, denied the affair herself. This is just more made up bullshit where the idiots involved are happy to follow orders....for a price.
100
posted on
04/15/2024 8:35:47 PM PDT
by
MagaMatt
(Sapere aude.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 221-230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson