Posted on 02/01/2024 8:34:29 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
Thanks for that reminder.
2016. Best. Election. Ever.
Yes. Me, too!
.....women want men that other women want...
Which is why Trump is winning big right now.
Look at the decrepit alternative.
This is the key 👁️: These smokes are going to be put out to gaslight that stealing is not possible.
Desperation...They can no longer keep women from voting for Trump. The ho mushroom women are now dying off and the young ones are seeing the old and wall mushroom women as having been used, pimped, killers, jealous of each other, ostracized.
....Be a man, like Donald Trump. Women want what other women want. Any man not voting Trump is a ____.
Again, they are gaslighting the smoked, to smoke that it “can’t be fake, stolen”.
I know what you mean. Consider the thesis of Benjamin Kidd underlying the 19th. But there is one major substantive change with regard to the sexes the Founders could not have envisioned.
Both the 18th and 19th Amendments were supported by the same political interests that effected adoption of the other Progressive Amendments, principally women, churches, and civic organizations. The linkage between Prohibition and the developing women’s suffrage movements in the Women’s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) is well documented. Once organized against alcohol, it was easier to redirect those same relationships in the WCTU to bring women’s suffrage to conclusion. But what was bad about that?
In retrospect, this change in the status of women was in the course of a more fundamental socio-economic transformation having nothing to do with politics or culture, without which both the women’s and temperance movements would have been politically impossible: The steady mechanization of industry. Machines were eating away at male domination. When most of the American population was engaged in agriculture and resource extraction with hand or animal-powered equipment, women’s roles were clearly defined by the biology of superior male physical strength and female childrearing to make enough babies for some to survive. As more of these traditionally male jobs were displaced by machines, more men moved into urban jobs that could be performed by women, a trend that increases with the sophistication of the machinery. Today, pneumatics, hydraulics, air conditioning, and electronic controls have made machinery so capable and factories so tolerable that there are relatively few jobs women cannot do in agriculture or industry. There remain evident professional preferences among women (particularly in nursing, k-12 teaching, and service industries (including government agencies)). Effectively, the automation of machines is what made the sexes “more equal” AND vastly expanded the supply of labor, thus keeping individual wages lower. In other words, chemistry and engineering did more for the equality of the sexes than lawyers and politicians ever did (of course, one could say the same about engineers and chemists in public health and medical technology).
Similarly, the mechanization of work made the consequences of alcohol and drug use on the job (or even at home) far more consequential both to capital and to life and limb, simply because inebriated workers are more likely to make more consequential errors when equipped with powerful machinery, thus increasing the risk of production errors with significant associated liabilities to stockholders. Here again, progressive activism was aligned with corporate interests.
Biden is going to spend the entire campaign telling women Trump appointed three judges to the Supreme Court, and they all struck down Roe v. Wade, and if he is allowed back in the White House he may appoint more who'll "do worse." It's going to murder him with female voters. He may still win because of independents and men, but he is going to struggle heavily with women."
How is it that in 2022, uber pro-life Kansas GOP Sen. Moran won re-election by nearly the exact. same. margin that the Kansas abortion Amendment lost?How is it that when the Montana abortion Referendum was defeated on the ballot, the Montana GOP picked up 3 state senate seats and one in the statehouse from pro-lifers? Or that pro-life Montana GOP Rep. Zinke (who is considered a pro-life 'zealot' by the marxists) and Rep. Rosendale, both won easily? Hmmmmmeowwwww....
In fact, the Independent in Rosendale's race beat the Democrat! Where's the pro-abortion anti-GOP 'Roe, Roe, Roe your Democrat' vote in that District? LOFL.
It's curious to me that the same half-a-dozen 'Freepers' go from thread to thread complaining about the GOP pro-life stance and bitch about how it 'cost us the mid-terms' and never post one single goddamn article of proof. Not one, not a link, not an exit poll - NOTHING.
Americans, even neomarxists -- but remarkably, not FReeptards -- know that abortion is genocide, and that Roe was an abominably evil blood libel against black babies.
And to boot, no proof ever offered overturning that evil had any 'influence' on the 'mid-terms'.
President Trump has already plainly stated, 'I want to put a desk and a chair on the Capitol steps as I am leaving from my [second] Inauguration to sign 4 or 5 Executive Orders', and the first will be the restoration of the Mexico City Policy.
Gyno centric society
They will choose that over everything else, and then expect a bailout at the end.
Every time it's brought up on a referendum, people will vote to legalize it. Even if it's in Mormon Utah.
The American people have spoken. We want abortion to be legal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.