Today's Supreme Court Argument Hints That It Will Drive a Stake Through the Heart of Federal Rulemaking

Red State ^ | 01/17/2024 | Streiff

[zeugma]

For those interested in reading the transcripts yourselves, you can find them here:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2023

[zeugma]

Would love to see a 9-0 ruling on this...

It would be nice, but I doubt that will happen. If you look at the wording of the liberals in their questions, they really like these agencies having the ability to rewrite law a the drop of a hat.

I agree with other posters here that the administrative state is the most dangerous part of our feral government. The BATFE is a great example of that. They just make shit up on the fly.

[Republican in occupied CA]

I want Wickard V Filburn dead.

[WASCWatch]

Roberts’ questions were a clear indication he is going to reverse the Chevron deference or se erely limit it.

[CFW]

"Roberts’ questions were a clear indication he is going to reverse the Chevron deference or se erely limit it."

---

Oh, I agree that he thinks it is bad law. But, I have a hard time believeing he will get rid of the entire underlying consequences of Chevron and how it has been used by administrative agencies since the case's ruling.