Skip to comments.
Supreme Court rejects Jack Smith’s request for justices to quickly hear Trump immunity dispute
CNN ^
Posted on 12/22/2023 12:05:06 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: V_TWIN
My concern is shenanigans at the election supervisor and precinct level regardless of what the SCOTUS saysMy first thought was, "It won't matter in CAL, NY. etc." However, absence of Trump's name might change the coattail numbers and turnout.
To: C210N
All of you done good. News so good it’s meant to be heard more than once.
22
posted on
12/22/2023 1:31:16 PM PST
by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: Tench_Coxe
Will they assassinate Trump now?
To: alternatives?
24
posted on
12/22/2023 2:33:59 PM PST
by
TornadoAlley3
( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
To: alternatives?
Don’t know. But it was talked about in 2020 about interests having trillions of dollars at stake if Trump won again.
25
posted on
12/22/2023 2:34:36 PM PST
by
Tench_Coxe
(The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
26
posted on
12/22/2023 2:58:10 PM PST
by
BlackFemaleArmyColonel
(No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
To: bigbob
27
posted on
12/22/2023 2:59:09 PM PST
by
BlackFemaleArmyColonel
(No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
To: Dan in Wichita
Because Trump is suing them and others.
28
posted on
12/22/2023 3:00:20 PM PST
by
BlackFemaleArmyColonel
(No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
To: TornadoAlley3
Not to interfere, is to interfere.
29
posted on
12/22/2023 4:39:35 PM PST
by
cmj328
(We live here.)
To: cmj328
Not to interfere, is to interfere.Similar to oxymorons in Orwell.
To: Tench_Coxe
Maybe Jack Smith should read up on the law and show some courage in his convictions instead of asking SCOTUS to spoon feed him . He’s basically trying to figure out if he has a case before trying to make it so he can go find a different line of attack in court — He certainly doesn’t want to waste time with a loser of a case.
To: C210N
I think this action by SCOTUS is better than ruling that Trump has immunity. If that had happened the propaganda “SCOTUS ruling shows bias” would be playing at max volume. But we should not become complacent.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson