Posted on 12/07/2023 4:32:30 AM PST by MtnClimber
The difference between Harvard and Penn compared to tech powerhouse MIT is that, at MIT, the few liberal arts majors there are treated as special ed.
I watched about an hour of that testimony and was surprised that all of them appeared to be out of their element as university presidents. When you think of people in such positions you picture well experienced, wise, articulate persons, possessing and exhibiting good judgement and prudence.
These persons appeared to be shallow ideologues, poorly prepared and out of their league as distinguished university presidents. Have we reached the bottom of the pit in both government and education????
How are selection of university presidents made?? Trustees? Peers? Who?? In these cases they did a lousy job!!!
“the left is a movement of bigotry, racism and hate.”
Hence my tagline.
L
Cancel culture at its most extreme....a real eye-opener.
Academia refuses to have a conservative speaker on campus because it makes some
students feel “triggered or unsafe.” Yet anti-Israeli rallies threatening genocide, are A-okay.
Unattractive liberal hags running everything into the ground.
Stefanik should have asked them if it was free speech to threaten BLM, trannies or any other of these groups and watched them squirm.
The Poison Ivy League is not what it use to be.
Yeah—that is exactly what I said.
Stefanik should have asked them if it was free speech to threaten BLM, trannies or any other of these groups and watched them squirm.
That’s why I don’t think anything will change on these campuses. Until maybe someone gets killed (which I think will eventually happen), but even then it’s 50/50.
Thanks for that.....you’re brilliant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.