Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special counsel argues judge should not disqualify herself from Trump Jan. 6 case
The Hill ^ | 09/15/2023 | REBECCA BEITSCH

Posted on 09/15/2023 8:40:03 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: ChicagoConservative27

Jack Smith needs an EXORCISM by his Rabbi he’s so EVIL!


21 posted on 09/15/2023 9:09:18 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I don’t think that Jerk Smith has any intention of “winning.”

The Judge is Biased, Corrupted and Dirty. No way the trial will stand legal muster. The entire trial is for show.

A Bad Show at that.


22 posted on 09/15/2023 9:10:46 AM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What we need is a law that if a judge is overridden by a higher court, they are personally responsible for paying the defendants’ attorney fees for the case.


23 posted on 09/15/2023 9:11:33 AM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

She’s Black......they will cover for her.


24 posted on 09/15/2023 9:14:17 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding And has been a judge on other cases involving Jan 6th. She is disqualified on 2 counts.


25 posted on 09/15/2023 9:31:24 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The judge has no choice. Her bias in undeniable. Her ruling would not be respected in this case, and could lead to justifiable violence. Hmmm…that could be their plan all along.


26 posted on 09/15/2023 9:42:32 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The judge has previously stated Trump should already be in prison...NO EVIDENCE OF BIAS?


27 posted on 09/15/2023 9:53:28 AM PDT by Gnome1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Why is Kevin McCarthy still paying for this unhinged, hyperpartisan persecution?

And why are the prosecutors arguing to keep this judge? If they have a real case, the judge shouldn’t matter.

By arguing against the request, they expose their scam.


28 posted on 09/15/2023 9:54:56 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pas

You are correct. But she will not recuse. No way. Though this increases Trumps probable victory on appeal. But we know a conviction is not what they want, they want Trump out.


29 posted on 09/15/2023 10:15:44 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ( Biden-Fetterman in ‘24: It's a no brainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Smith has a vested interest in keeping her on the case. Where would they find another judge who’s such a radical Democrat?


30 posted on 09/15/2023 10:29:10 AM PDT by popdonnelly (All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Such BS. Why would any prosecutor care which judge sees the case if it is so air tight?

Oh wait...


31 posted on 09/15/2023 12:14:28 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Reverse the situation and Jack Smith and his thugs would be having a melt down if the judge didn’t recuse herself.


32 posted on 09/15/2023 2:03:26 PM PDT by falcon99 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Because the defendant’s motion fails to establish any bias by the Court.

It’s like no evidence about Joeys China deals.

Baffle them with bullshit the lefts main tool.


33 posted on 09/15/2023 2:29:56 PM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

How is Jack Smith still allowed to practice law?


34 posted on 09/15/2023 2:31:38 PM PDT by Fledermaus (It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson