BTTT
“The reason we are considered a food apartheid or in this food apartheid is because of disinvestment, and the disinvestment has come locally from government,”
No, it is because of theft. Y’all can only steal so much before “da man” gets fed up with it and moves out. You can’t claim racism in this case.
That’s about what this would boil down to — bottomless food banks, free for the taking. I’m sure all the prosperous north side liberals will be happy to contribute.
Captain Obvious wonders why liberals never ever get a clue.
There will be immigrants as armed guards and you will need the mark of the beast at the bug food store.
How Communistic! I was able to visit East Berlin before the wall came down and observed several state-owned stores. The one characteristic of all were long lines waiting to get in to stores with very few goods for sales. I saw a shoe store with perhaps 100 people waiting in line to get in the store while there might have been 50 pairs of shoes on the shelves. CONTROL is the objective.
How Communistic! I was able to visit East Berlin before the wall came down and observed several state-owned stores. The one characteristic of all were long lines waiting to get in to stores with very few goods for sales. I saw a shoe store with perhaps 100 people waiting in line to get in the store while there might have been 50 pairs of shoes on the shelves. CONTROL is the objective.
Changing the environment will not change the people and their bad habits.
Change the people and the environment will change.
Liberals have it backwards, as usual.
I guess if I were to put a grocery store outpost in the middle of an urban “food desert,” I would name it:
Fort Zinderneuf Foods
Staffed by union clerks no doubt with taxpayer subsidies to offset the high costs.
Cheese, rice, flour and beans should be free. Let them have that. If these animals want meat let them earn it.
The leftists went from calling them food deserts to the scarier, more anti-white term “food apartheid”. It’s still the fault of the people of color in those areas.
Yep - what will change other than American taxpayers to be on the hook for this subsidized shoplifting?
Because free housing and all the other goodies these parasites receive has worked so well.
It’s free anyway because the blacks just steal it.
“ Pawar said the model of offering millions in city subsidies to large operators has failed.”
That’s not the policy that’s failed. The failed policy is allowing a certain segment of our population to engage in organized theft without being punished for it.
But this idiot would never admit to that.
There’s so much wrong with this proposal it’s hard to respond to all of it.
L
Yeah, put the corrupt City of Chicago in charge of a grocery store. What could possibly go wrong?
How Soviet of them! What next no name white labels on canned goods?
String bags?
Looong lines?