Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vivek Ramaswamy is not legally eligible to be President.
Trevor Sutcliffe on Twitter ^ | February 24, 2023 | Trevor Sutcliffe

Posted on 07/27/2023 1:23:56 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 461-468 next last
To: ridesthemiles

The name of the hospital is correct, and how do we know that really is Obama’s social security number?


241 posted on 07/27/2023 5:44:38 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: CrazyCatChick

Ugh.

What about the parents???

You do realize, do you not?, that almost no other countries in the world other than the U.S. recognize as citizens domestically born individuals regardless of the citizenship of the parents.


242 posted on 07/27/2023 5:45:56 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: poinq
Yes, Obama was born in Hawaii and was born a citizen.

How do you know that?

His mother was a citizen so he was.

His mother being a citizen has nothing to do with it. If he was born in a foreign country, (like Canada), he wouldn't get citizenship because *SHE* didn't meet the qualifications necessary (naturalization act of 1952) to give it to him.

If he was born in Hawaii, he would get 14th amendment citizenship.

In either case, he wouldn't be a natural citizen. He would be one created by an act of congress, which is "naturalization."

And there is no evidence that his mother left Hawaii when she was pregnant.

There is evidence she was in Seattle around August 19th of 1961. How would she get to Washington state if she didn't leave while she was pregnant? They wouldn't let infants fly in those days. Other freepers posted copies of the airline rules from that time period, and you could not fly with an infant.

There is also a letter written by Barack Obama Sr saying they were going to give up the child for adoption.

There is lots of evidence that she was there in school the whole year.

My recollection is there are absolutely no records of her whereabouts from March of 1961 to August of `1961. If you have some evidence that disproves this, I would very much like to see it.

243 posted on 07/27/2023 5:46:03 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel
He must be eating into the Trump support for his supporters to trot out this ridiculous allegation. If you are born in this country despite where your family came from you are eligible to be POTUS

So far as the legal system is concerned, but not actually true as evidence can prove.

Barack Obama proved that

He proved that the courts do not give a crap about the issue, and will just regurgitate what they were taught.

244 posted on 07/27/2023 5:48:00 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Obama was born in Vancouver Canada. He was not a US Citizen by birth. That is the dirty secret they covered up about him.

That is the best guess from the available evidence.

245 posted on 07/27/2023 5:48:42 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
The Supreme Court has held that an individual born in the United States is a "natural born citizen" regardless of the citizenship of his parents.

Well that is incorrect. The Wong Kim Ark court held that Wong Kim Ark was a citizen. They didn't say anything about him being a "natural born" citizen. They conspicuously left that part off.

There are reams of laws and court cases supporting this.

And also supporting abortion, Homosexual marriage, the belief that men can become women, and all sorts of other stupid and ridiculous crap.

Modern courts are full of morons and liars.

246 posted on 07/27/2023 5:51:10 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You’re post is spot on.


247 posted on 07/27/2023 5:51:17 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

And the child would be taken with the parents to whatever country they were deported to.

And the child could come back after the age of 35 and run for president, because he was a citizen who did not require any acts to claim his rights of citizenship (unless, I guess, the US denaturalized him, too).


248 posted on 07/27/2023 5:52:09 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

No.

Simplistic...as in, too simple, and thus unworkable!


249 posted on 07/27/2023 5:52:15 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Stop with the stupid birtherism crap, just a bunch of trumptard losers that never shut up, u suck


250 posted on 07/27/2023 5:52:24 PM PDT by baclava
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
That's right, Vivek Ramaswampy was not a natural born Citizen at birth ensuring sole allegiance to the United States.

If only this actually meant anything to the legions of leftists looking to destroy this once-great country.

The fact of the matter is, although remote, Vivek would likely not be challenged successfully on this matter given his birth in Cincy.

Even bringing this up is just unnecessary and silly - he's way behind in the polls if you believe them. It's meaningless and distracting noise from what should be the MAIN goal. But, like always, the right is great at beating themselves up and not the leftists, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
251 posted on 07/27/2023 5:54:19 PM PDT by proud_dad_of_two (Formerly MikefromOhio (I couldn't remember my password and lost the email account too!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

‘In either case, he wouldn’t be a natural citizen. He would be one created by an act of congress, which is “naturalization.”’

What process did he have to go through before he could vote for the first time?


252 posted on 07/27/2023 5:57:15 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: CrazyCatChick

Yes, the U.S., if it wants to be seen by its citizens and by others as a self-respecting sovereign country, should denaturalize such children too.

Out with the whole lot of them.

Good thinking—this would seem to be one of the few examples one can posit in which one born in this country to two U.S. citizens can potentially justifiably be stripped of U.S. citizenship (i.e., one or both parents determined to have acquired U.S. citizenship fraudulently or for purposes of committing treason).


253 posted on 07/27/2023 5:58:45 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
The simple fact is that Citizenship at birth is defined by the 14th Amendment.

I have spent much of the day perusing the debates on the 14th amendment. They flat out say it's "naturalization" in those debates. And it is.

Congress only has the power of "naturalization." It cannot make natural what is not already natural. It can only naturalize.

That supersedes the common law interpretation in the Original Constitution.

And here is another error. The "common law" is not the source of citizenship. "Common law" deals with subjects. You won't find the word "citizen" anywhere in the common law.

The word "citizen" does not actually come from England. It is a Swiss word. (Look it up on Etymology online.)

Why would we be using a Swiss word instead of the common law English word "Subject"?

So now, if you were born a Citizen under the 14th Amendment you are a Natural Born Citizen for all intents and purposes.

Well this is certainly true, but only because the modern courts are so hive mind locked that they won't bother to consider any other possibility.

It's one of the deficiencies in our hide bound "precedent" based legal system.

Get over it. You won’t win this argument in any court in the nation.

Which means something legally, but means nothing factually.

254 posted on 07/27/2023 6:02:26 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CrazyCatChick

BTW: In addition to the age and NBC requirements, there’s also the Constitution’s extended stateside residency requirement for both POTUS and VPOTUS.


255 posted on 07/27/2023 6:02:39 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

“You do realize, do you not?, that almost no other countries in the world other than the U.S. recognize as citizens domestically born individuals regardless of the citizenship of the parents.”

And that matters how in this discussion? We’re talking about the US, not other countries.


256 posted on 07/27/2023 6:04:01 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

“Yes, the U.S., if it wants to be seen by its citizens and by others as a self-respecting sovereign country, should denaturalize such children too.”

That isn’t the point. The child, a US citizen or - through no fault of his own - denaturalized, would go with his deported parents.

The arguments in the original post aren’t helpful for determining citizenship.


257 posted on 07/27/2023 6:06:45 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

OMG, please change your name to Nacho Man, because your legal acumen is about that of a container of Taco Bell Cheese Nachos.

The 14th Amendment is the embodiment of the law on natural born citizenship. Read Wong Kim Ark.


258 posted on 07/27/2023 6:08:12 PM PDT by Penelope Dreadful (And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts. +Sodomy & Abortion are NOT cornerstones of Civilization! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

“BTW: In addition to the age and NBC requirements, there’s also the Constitution’s extended stateside residency requirement for both POTUS and VPOTUS.”

Then the worry about Brunhilde birthing a baby on a stopover on her way home to Dusseldorf makes even less sense.

A Chinese spy who comes to the US, births a baby, takes that baby home and indoctrinates him to come back to the US to become president, would not be eligible regardless of all this arguing about natural born v naturalized.


259 posted on 07/27/2023 6:11:50 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: x

Good question! Their notes.


260 posted on 07/27/2023 6:13:08 PM PDT by null and void (Intelligence has limits, while gullibility doesn't. ~ SunkenCiv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 461-468 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson