Posted on 07/03/2023 8:17:04 AM PDT by Twotone
Under the 13th Amendment, isn’t ownership of humans as property by the gay couple illegal?
$30k for 9 months of pain and suffering is not worth it.
Don't forget the fake virtue of being able to say the hetero couple support gayness with more than just words.
…”It’s not nice to fool with Mother Nature”…
To some people, children are fashion accessories. The don’t want to love a child, they only want show them off.
This young woman lacked the wisdom to know this and has suffered immensely.
mental illness on parade once again, this is all it is
Oh, that's right, reality says, real men, cannot have babies.
THEY (both) would not have their DNA out there. A gay couple cannot produce a child. There has to be some other party involved to provide either the sperm or the egg.
Perhaps the woman carrying the baby provided the egg, but maybe not. Nevertheless, who ever donated what to make that child possible, should also have a say in that child's life.
Sad to say, it's probably for the better that that poor baby didn't make it since it was being already treated by the alleged parents as a commodity with less value than an old shoe.
But to place your Wife’s body (uterus & all) on top of the
altar to all things PC? That’s a big sacrifice just to score points.
The oldest of their four children may be privately wondering: “Aren’t we good enough for Mom and Dad to be happy?
I thought we were done dealing with Baby Stuff.”
Giving up your child to a gay couple is wrong to begin with. The rest is moot.
~~~~~~
Amen! Add that California’s schizophrenic law was passed before this woman signed her surrogacy contract. The only victim here is the murdered baby.
AMEN. what was she thinking?
my kids friend got 50k she already had 3 kiddos and went on to have twins. she did it for the $$$$ to buy a house.
it is border line criminal
Amen, teeman8r.
The child is in paradise and will never be sick or unhappy. The “gay couple” may not ever have that opportunity.
My mother had cancer in 1959 while she pregnant with me.
?????
I guess you didn’t bother reading the article.
“Several prospective adoptive parents had stepped forward, including the surrogate’s aunt, but to no avail. The gay “intended parents” refused to consent.”
Those two loathsome human beings should be charged with murder.
Asinine use of pronouns, or evidence of illegal gene splicing human experiments?
I wouldn't put the latter past that crowd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.