Posted on 06/21/2023 10:46:40 AM PDT by CFW
he really believes if it came to that, that American Pilots would attack other Americans??...guess what granpappy, youd be the one getting bombed...democrats hate it to their core that we are armed. Drives em insane.
Just as was predicted in 2016 - see the movie “Amerigeddon”
The Taliban, ISIS, VC, and Feral Somalis did just fine with small arms and guerilla warfare.
God forbid the people ever turn on the United States of America and her government. It would be over pretty quick. I would not want to be a member of the military if the people turned on our country. Imagine 150 million Americans standing up for their rights in being incredibly well-armed versus a military that would not be very happy about going against her own sons and daughters. I think it would be a pretty quick and almost immediate collapse of our government’s leadership. Joe Biden is right about one thing. You don’t need an M16. You don’t need an AR-15. You don’t need an AR-14. All you need is the people to have a reason and if we are just a step away from an entire financial collapse if all people want is food and gas in their vehicle, politicians can be replaced pretty quick. Joe maybe replaced by his own party without guns. At this moment they could use the 25th amendment against him. They could use his prior actions of treason against the United States and even filling out a false statement when he ran for president that he did not engage in treasonous acts against his country. Governments need the military. All people need is a reason. Let them eat cake :-)
Difference was is the feds have home field advantage vs playing whack a mole with taliban in the desert caves of afghanistan.
I do believe however, fedzilla would be incapable of stopping taliban like warfare in the us.
Those javelins l they sent to ukraine would work rather nicely on stationary aircraft…..
Gives new meaning to the word “taught”.
This ruins the entire gun control position. They’re always saying it’s crazy to to think the government would come after us.
Here he is admitting it.
We’re the Obama words that the mental dwarf uttered written in his prompter or were they sent through the earpiece?
You dont need to take on the government, just the politicians.
Yes. Hes admitting he is above the law. He is admitting he has the gov handtied to his demands.
He is a vile snake.
Everyone seems to get lured right straight into the contentious aspect of this whole premise and thus focus on the debate between if, what, and how a conflict between citizens and government would take.
I would like to back on out and focus on the context of the statement in general;
Why is the POTUS even framing the second amendment in terms of winning a conflict with it’s own citizens at all?
Isn’t he inherently telegraphic his problem with the second amendment? That citizens may be able to defend themselves against government?
It’s rather chilling
Didn’t this whole “gun control” thing start by saying we
couldn’t have sawed off shot guns .... because
they were NOT weapons of war ...
or am I confused again....?
What we don’t need is DC anymore. It has proven itself, as the anti-federalists knew, to have become a tyrannical government.
doesnt he require the consent of the governed
you know democracy and all that
and what if we refused
Did Bidet ever teach in law school? I bet not.
Too bad Ashley didnt have an AR-15 when papa Joe jumped in the shower with her
How long were we mired down in Ashcanistan before FJB left them billion$ in weapons?
The fact of the matter is we’re truly under Continuity of Government operations.
Nothing is what it seems.
Assuming that's true, those students need to demand their tuition refunded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.