Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Jordan Neely Dilemma: Just Stay Seated and Do Nothing? When self-defense becomes vigilantism and racism.
Frontpage Mag ^ | 05/13/2023 | Thoms Nickels

Posted on 05/13/2023 5:25:22 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Labyrinthos

He threatened mass violence and was taken down. There was a clear and immediate threat. No one is obligated to wait for him to start attacking. He was clearly insane, the criminally insane must be neutralized quickly and efficiently. Have you seen his rap sheet? His existence was a curse upon the earth. This shouldn’t even be a news story, it should be common sense for violent lunatics to be taken out.


21 posted on 05/13/2023 8:34:53 PM PDT by libertarian66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Spok

The reason no one knows who Eli Dicken is is that the mass shooter he shot and stopped was white. If the goblin had been black, the perpetual race grievance industry would be calling for his head like they are with Daniel Penny.

As far as they are concerned, all black people must be allowed to do whatever they want to do, and no white person must interfere, under any circumstances. That is their vision of our national future.


22 posted on 05/13/2023 8:38:32 PM PDT by SharpenedEdge (Stockpile. Prepare. Arm. Train. A Storm is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

See, you have to wait until you are bludgeoned stabbed or shot and even them you are expected to take it. Government sanctioned attack on its citizens


23 posted on 05/14/2023 2:41:13 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Before anyone condemns Mr. Penny, they need to watch a 1967 movie “The Incident.”


24 posted on 05/14/2023 4:35:36 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpenedEdge

“..How Black Americans are treated as threats.”

Only the ones who ACT threatening; not the black-skinned whiteys do-gooders as portrayed on tv and in the movies..(who are ALWAYS the victims of evil, racist white people just because..)

Yes, you are exactly right - this is about black people who subscribe to the ghetto ‘culture’ being able to do whatever and get whatever they want, by any means, without opposition or consequences. - THAT is “justice”(?) to them…

It’s all a heart problem; if you’re a human being, regardless if you’re a multi-millionaire or in the gutter with nothing, there IS still right and wrong. Society shouldn’t have to alter because YOU want to choose ‘wrong’.


25 posted on 05/14/2023 6:01:37 AM PDT by joethedrummer (We can't vote our way out of this, folks..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: libertarian66

There’s a large disconnect between what you think the law should be and what NY law allows a person to do in self-defense of himself or others. Under NY law: “a person may use physical force upon another individual when, and to the extent that, he/she reasonably believes it to be necessary to defend himself/herself [or someone else] from what he/she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of [unlawful] physical force by such individual.”

As applied to the case at issue, Penny must have first had a reasonable belief that Neely’s use of unlawful physical force was imminent; and second, Penny’s response must have been reasonably proportionate to the threat. What is “reasonable” in perceiving the threat and the response to the perceived threat are generally questions of fact for the grand jury and if the grand jury indicts, the trial jury.

Under NY law, verbal threats do not justify the use of physical force let alone deadly physical force. Like it or not, that’s the law. If Neely was throwing punches or kicks (regardless of whether he actually struck someone) or even stepped toward someone with a clenched fist, then Penny would have been justified in using non-deadly force to stop the threat. If Neely displayed a weapon while making verbal threats, the Penny would have justified in using non-deadly force and perhaps even deadly force to stop the threat. From everything that I have read, however, Neely’s threats were verbal only and he did not display a weapon, and there lies the problem.


26 posted on 05/14/2023 7:20:31 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Under NY law, verbal threats do not justify the use of physical force let alone deadly physical force. Like it or not, that’s the law. If Neely was throwing punches or kicks (regardless of whether he actually struck someone) or even stepped toward someone with a clenched fist, then Penny would have been justified in using non-deadly force to stop the threat. If Neely displayed a weapon while making verbal threats, the Penny would have justified in using non-deadly force and perhaps even deadly force to stop the threat. From everything that I have read, however, Neely’s threats were verbal only and he did not display a weapon, and there lies the problem.

Thanks for your explanation...It is useful...

I feel bad for Mr. Neely...I am sure that he had good intentions...But...He might get convicted in this case...

27 posted on 05/14/2023 7:32:43 AM PDT by L.A.Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just Stay Seated and Do Nothing?

That’s why the find bodies in the subway

Jordan Neely stupidity cost him he was a heavy K2 user citizens have every right to protest them self and others.

The Marine acted wisely as the the black man helping him.


28 posted on 05/14/2023 9:16:37 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Resist, defy and struggle against any such laws. Smash the state. Especially NY state! And certainly, smash street criminals. The only mistake here was getting caught on the wrong side of some arbitrary rule called a “law.” Sure maybe next time wait for the next Neely to attack someone. And THEN put him in a chokehold. The time for passive cooperation is long, long gone.


29 posted on 05/14/2023 2:41:41 PM PDT by libertarian66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Except I have yet to see a single report or video where Neely made physical contact with anyone.

So, you have to give the criminal the first shot before you protect yourself or others? No response to verbal threats accompanied by insane behavior?

We have been advised on this- “When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.” — Maya Angelou

30 posted on 05/14/2023 4:46:14 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson