Posted on 04/27/2023 12:35:49 PM PDT by thegagline
“Can’t be forced to pay. It’s not different than a friendly bet reneged on made in a sports bar.”
Except in this case there is a signed contract written by Lindell’s own lawyers.
Did they look at Dominion at the scanner level? If not this is BS. When I “voted” last November I checked, for two Dominion Scanners there were seven WiFi connections.. SEVEN!
Not smart
Dumb thing to do.
You can read Zeidman’s report here:
https://www.zeidmanconsulting.com/download.htm
It doesn’t take much tech knowledge to know that Lindell was scammed by who ever gave him the data.
Lindell will have his chance in Court to “Present” his data packets he claimed
prove Dominion machines were tampered.
I predict he will lose and the amount the Court awards Dominion will be larger
than the Faux News Settlement.
Lindell’s goose is cooked.
Lindell will have his chance in Court to “Present” his data packets he claimed prove Dominion machines were tampered.
No he won’t. If an arbitration panel issued an award in favor of this guy, the conversion of an award to a court judgment is pro forma. There are extremely few grounds to overturn an arbitration award, and none of them allow the Court to reconsider the arbitrators’ factual determination.
I’m not referring to his 5 Million he has to pay.
I’m talking about Lindell vs Dominion Civil suit.
https://www.zeidmanconsulting.com/download.htm
So I did. These statements stuck out for me.
However, I received the following error message in Figure 3, confirming that the file did not contain packet data in any known format for packet data.
Translation, *I* don't know what this data is.
The remaining two files, rnx-000002.bin and rnx-000003.bin are each 21.6 Gbyte binary files that appear to be in the same unreadable format as file rnx-000001.bin. Attempting to open these files in Wireshark again produces an error message stating that the files do not contain packet data in any known format for packet data. They do not contain packet data or any information about the November 2020 election.
Translation, "*I* don't know what this data is."
The modification dates for the files are all August 2021. This means though they may have been created any time before that, the data within them was modified within the last two weeks. Thus they cannot represent data from the November 2020 election.
Translation, Because these files *MAY* have been modified on August, they must therefore not contain any information about the election of 2020.
That is a false conclusion.
I have proven that the data Lindell provides, and represents reflects information from the November 2020 election, unequivocally does not contain packet data of any kind and do not contain any information related to the November 2020 election.
No he didn't. It is exactly what I suspected. He couldn't read the files, and he therefore concluded on the basis of *NOT* knowing something, that he knows something.
I have created my own packet formats. Years ago when I was doing game programming, I created my own special packet formats to transmit to the other machines in the network information containing position, direction, velocity, damage, viewing perspectives, the vectors relating to virtual bullets being fired, and all sorts of other data.
My packets would be completely unreadable by software that didn't know how to interpret them.
Dominion has already made a big stink about how "proprietary" is their code, and presumably this would also be true of their packet data. You wouldn't know what the data means unless you knew how their software was using it.
This guy comes along and runs "wireshark" and concluded that because "wireshark" doesn't know what to do with the data, it cannot contain any information about the 2020 election. This is an erroneous conclusion.
He doesn't know what the data means, and he therefore cannot prove it is or is not from the 2020 election.
Any other programmers out there want to confirm my point?
This may be true. I would have never announced that this data proved the election was tampered with unless I could decode the data and demonstrate what it means and how it was used in the voting machines' network.
If Lindell's data people couldn't do that, they should not have made such a claim.
Rational people would not think someone would make such a claim unless they could prove it. Even if Lindell's "experts" were certain, he should have gotten some more experts to confirm their findings before running with it.
Did you read the parts on the files he could open and were clearly not packet data? According to the “Prove Mike Wrong” contest rules he only had to prove one file was not data from the 2020 election.
I did read those files and I believe he correctly identified what they were. If Lindell said he only had to prove one of the files was not data from the 2020 election, then Lindell was a stupid dumbass and so were his attorneys that let him do that.
It should have been only the large data files, or he should have zipped them all together as a bundle and called that his one file.
But the point remains, what this guy seems to have done is a cheesy legal hair splitting argument and I regard it as very unethical.
Lindell was very foolish for not being able to demonstrate what the files were himself. He should have been able to do that, or he should have shut up.
Also, Windham, NH...
“In short, the arbitration panel said Lindell’s data was unrelated to the 2020 election.”
Could “the arbitration panel” understand the data?
The steal was a low tech activity, techniques the Pendergasts, Boss Tweed, Richard Daley, or the Duke of Duval would have recognized. Ballot box stuffing, evidenced by sudden surges in Democrat votes in the early hours of the Wednesday after the election in perhaps no more than two dozen urban or suburban counties in six states. The 1960 and 1976 Presidential elections were likely stolen although only one or two states were involved. The Deep State wanted to ensure Trump’s defeat, and accomplished the same.
Exactly!
We’ve allowed election shenanigans in certain urban centers to go on for decades due to fear of the race card. All the Rats did was industrialize that crooked process. Six states, six urban centers (maybe a few more!) & 7 counties. You control those you win the election. Nothing exotic needed!
No the cheating was diverse, sophisticated and ubiquitous. Some low tech some high tech.
If you are like me, you have noticed a plethora of stories doing a bit of re-writing of history as to the 2020 election and the fraud that was baked into that election. They are setting up straw-men and then knocking them down, while ignoring the true instances of fraud. In addition, they are taking the number of ballots submitted and doing basic addition and saying “See? We came up with the same number. No fraud here!”.
When you are just counting the fraudulent ballots over and over again, you aren’t going to find the evidence of fraud. The double-counting, fake signatures, “adjudication” process, casting ballots on behalf of nursing home residents, from residences that did not exist, etc, is where the fraud was done.
He didn’t disprove anything. He just got a progressive jury to side with him against the facts.
There was no jury. Reading comprehension: F
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.