Posted on 03/01/2023 7:31:23 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The Communist Chinese will work this all out ..after they fully take over.
Then there’s the difference n the number that are prosecuted. Back then, prosecutors were only bought off by the mob.
This why one will find conservatives that are in full support of abortion...yeah, weird.
They’d rather legally and silently kill em in the womb, than to have to illegally kill em in the streets 20 years later. They’re totally out of control, and the country is headed to a Rhodesia/South Africa future IF we don’t turn it around....and soon.
If they solve the crime and identify the black perp then they have to actually arrest the guy.
That may be dangerous, and they know the police chief and the mayor and the district attorney will not have their back if the suspect resists.
“Mailing it in” is the common sense solution.
We need a spiritual awakening, not more Moloch worship.
Kinda difficult to solve murders when people are too afraid to come forward as witnesses.
I have several people, I know who are "Die Hard" conservatives, probably would agree with 99.9% of everything said here. But when it comes to the issue of abortion, they roll their eyes and say, "Why should we have to pay for all these ghetto babies? Damn right I support abortion!"
Apples and truck comparison.
Rhodesia and South Africa have been 90% + black for several generations. Blacks in America? 15%....and if you take out women, children, elderly, disabled, and incarcerated, you have <5% of the US population. THink the Latinos, Native Americans, Rednecks, and Orientals will roll over for them? Never.
The government however.......
And everyone knows that snitches get stitches. There probably aren't many eyewitnesses to these crimes.
From what I hear this happens a lot. These shootings happen in some of the inner city areas. There are often crowds of people around , but when the police arrive , nobody saw anything.
“..We need a spiritual awakening, not more Moloch worship...”
Absolutely! No disagreement on that.
I wasn’t insulating that I was pro-abortion at all...just the opposite.
FWIW, my wife and I have been friends with a conservative couple that were very pro-life the entire time we’ve ever known them, but all that completely changed AFTER they accidentally got caught up in a BLM riot a couple years back and were almost killed. Not anymore after that, they’re in full support abortion now. When we asked em “why”, they gave us the answer I posted above. I walked away shaking my head....we’re still friends with em, but not like we were before because of this issue.
The real risk is probably 2% of the population—16-30 year old males, and probably only half of them.
That is why “racial profiling” was a thing—while it may have been unfair from time to time the benefits to society as a whole were very significant.
Amazing decline even with the advancements in forensic science and proliferation of cameras/video.
Bingo!
I would not consider a case solved until a conviction is obtained.
Addressing the black murder problem initiates a domino effect of uncomfortable topics. The breakup of the family, the poor education environment, and the declining morality are subjects that the Democrat Party don’t want to discuss because it will reveal how their policies have destroyed the people they most rely on for votes and political power.
When are democrat politicians going to start requiring blacks to call them “Massa”?????????
“This why one will find conservatives that are in full support of abortion...yeah, weird.
“They’d rather legally and silently kill em in the womb, than to have to illegally kill em in the streets 20 years later.”
__________
Are these examples of the “conservatives” you are talking about?:
“We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” — Margaret Sanger in a letter on her “Negro Project,” written to eugenics proponent Clarence Gamble
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” — Ruth Bader Ginsberg, in response to a question by Emily Bazelon, published in the New York Times on July 7, 2009
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.