Harvard University Admission Case: Three Activist SCOTUS Justices Root For Racial Discrimination In Oral Arguments, But Six Others Are Skeptical

The Federalist ^ | 11/02/2022 | ASRA Q. NOMANI

[ExTxMarine]

Affirmative action IS racial discrimination. PERIOD.

Even worse, it is the very definition of SYSTEMIC RACISM!!

And it was put into place at the suggestion of THE GOVERNMENT...meaning it was instituted under the color of law! It is time to end this debauchery against our Constitution, where all people are supposed to be treated equally, under the law.

[Hieronymus]

Justices of the Catholic faith have predominated on the Court.

---

You must be younger than I.

While Taney was, as another person noted, the first Catholic, it was not until Reagan that one had multiple Catholics on the court (with, IIRC, about a two-year exception in the early 20th century). However, once Reagan broke the barrier it was broken with a vengance as you note. For the last 2-3 decades, most of the “protestants” have been lapsed or ex-Catholics, with Thomas, who is an ex-seminarian but was practicing as an Episcopalean at confirmation and then eventually reverted being exhibit A.

[I want the USA back]

Asians are really the victims of discrimination. Inherently very intelligent, they have an ethic of hard work and persistence. So they do well. Then they are beaten by members of America’s #1 certified victim group and given an unfair deal in college admissions.

[traderrob6]

“The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination.”

If ever there was an appropriate time to state “two wrongs do NOT make a right” it’s here.

[Svartalfiar]

If ever there was an appropriate time to state “two wrongs do NOT make a right” it’s here.

This is true, but three lefts DO make a right!