Posted on 11/01/2022 6:28:42 AM PDT by AbolishCSEU
This isn’t really about human rights.
It’s about Deep State having a mad-on for small biz private sector competition.
Just require a 700+ credit score.
Ah! did you think there was actually something called “private property”? You would be mistaken. You just have the title, and must pay taxes and the upkeep.
Where’s the “City of Evil” graphic???
Maybe the landlord doesn’t want his properties to be trashed when they move out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBxrHlzq4LQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Puc1CLwWNms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovtinAAqb_Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpTJ_m3oGRQ
“Just require a 700+ credit score.”
My friend was looking for an apartment on Capitol Hill in DC about 17 years ago.
He had inherited $300,000 but no landlord would rent to him since his income was too low.
He wound up buying a place with an IRS tax lien that simply had to be sold.
Also, I've noticed that many of the Section 8ers are entitled race hustlers. On more than one occasion I was told that I must accept them as tenants as it would be racist not to.
The communists want to force landlords to rent to anyone.
Landlords have the right to control who is in their property in a free country .
Requiring Fane to allow at least 5% of his properties to be destroyed will ultimately lead to his insurance being dropped. He should just sell off his properties now and smile at the property taxes he will no longer be paying.
We have a client who is an elderly woman in NYC. In November 2017, her now deceased husband took tenants with housing assistance - the city was to pay about 2/3, they were to pay the difference. They made one payment of the difference when signing the lease and never made another.
In 2018 she sought to have them evicted. In 2019 they settled with a signed agreement to only accept the city’s $1300 for a year, then in 2020 they would voluntarily move out.
They didn’t (surprise). And then they couldn’t be evicted because covid. As covid was ending, the tenants decided to file a complaint for violating her human rights. As part of that, she is forbidden from taking any action which may be deemed retaliatory (read: eviction). So now they’re at 5 years and counting of rent-free living in NYC.
Her supposed wrongdoings consisted of some shouting (unverified), not responding to an e-mail about death of a service dog, not timely fixing the heat when it went on the fritz, and not accepting the city’s payments. And of course the Division of Human Rights has found probable cause that she is the wrongdoer here and is now going to sue her.
In the military-—
Section 8 == unfit for service due to mental issues== discharged
How about $4000 a month rent for each 1000 sq ft???
Indirectly, those other landlords did him a favor.
Socialists deliberately confuse “rights” with “entertainments”.
A right is something you are allowed to DO (worship, speak, own and bear arms) which government is not allowed to interfere with.
An entitlement is something which someone else is under obligation to provide to you.
Let the tenant take their voucher and go live in New York State Attorney General Letitia James’s house. Sue her if she refuses to take them in.
The area that I have rental property in is strictly blue collar/low income that was once a bedroom community for Xerox.
Since those jobs dried up a long time ago, it has become the seat for the county’s social service agency. I have to lower the bar to 600 or better.
Of course Tish James will soon be outlawing screening based on credit score. That’s next. They’ve already sealed eviction records.
“Housing is a basic human right.”
That means that every citizen of Africa is entitled to live for free in the home of every New York state official.
Time to walk the walk!
Interesting, brilliant!
Copying for reference.
I haven't been a landlord for over 20 years.
I always had the best of renters, most, better than me.
But I found I just didn't like being a landlord for some reason I can't explain.
James is even to the left of Ithaca??
I agree That’s why the background check on firearms purchases is unconstitutional you in effect have to get the government’s permission to buy a firearm. If you have to get the government’s permission to do something IT IS NOT A RIGHT. I is a privilege/entitlement
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.