Posted on 10/17/2022 7:44:18 AM PDT by TigerClaws
China is a “racialized” nation. They care about Chinese, not any minorities. Further, China has no respect for human life, as witnessed by their history and their actions today.
Me: “What eugenic theories?”
You: Read Darwin’s Origin of Species (it’d probably be banned if I posted the full title of his book). In it he noted things like that red ants used black ants as slaves and that, in his view, the red ant colony would cease to exist without the black ant slaves.
What eugenic theories
You: What eugenic theories?
Me: Read Darwin's Origin of Species (it'd probably be banned if I posted the full title of his book). In it he noted things like that red ants used black ants as slaves and that, in his view, the red ant colony would cease to exist without the black ant slaves.
Also me: For those who couldn't piece together how his natural selection fit into keeping non-whites in their place, Darwin wrote a sequel to his book a decade or so later. In Descent of Man he gets really ugly about how whites evolved in a way superior to non-whites, how life is better off if the whites out-produce the non-whites, and that it can be best achieved by if whites keep non-whites too poor to survive and thrive (the argument being thriving leads to more babies).
You: What eugenic theories
And Nietzsche’s sister was the one to blame?
Darwin’s work led directly to the Final Solution. We even have leftists today saying kill babies up to and after birth.
China described the AUKUS agreement — between Australia, the UK and the US – as a race-based military bloc of white countries.
“In Descent of Man he gets really ugly “
How?
In 1881, toward the end of his life, Charles Darwin wrote to a colleague that the “more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilised races throughout the world.”1 This was not just some offhand comment unrelated to Darwin’s science. It reflected important elements of his theory of human evolution. Indeed, he articulated this same principle in his scientific study of human evolution, The Descent of Man (1871), where he claimed, “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races.”2 Not only racism, but racial extermination was an integral feature of Darwin’s theory from the start.
This is a position that has been articulated by many historians of science.3 Two prominent historians specializing in the history of Darwinism, Adrian Desmond and James Moore, mince no words about the racism inherent in Darwin’s theory. In their magisterial biography of Darwin, they state, “‘Social Darwinism’ is often taken to be something extraneous, an ugly concretion added to the pure Darwinian corpus after the event, tarnishing Darwin’s image. But his notebooks make plain that competition, free trade, imperialism, racial extermination, and sexual inequality were written into the equation from the start — ‘Darwinism’ was always intended to explain human society.”4
https://evolutionnews.org/2022/02/the-racism-of-darwin-and-darwinism/
His fans may try to excuse Darwin as a “man of his times” but he clearly was racist and his theories led directly to mass slaughter.
Be use he’s viewed as “anti-Christian” and “anti-God” he’s gotten a free pass by leftists and the academy.
Exactly.
It’s a real resentment but one sided.
China (India as well, Japan before WWI) was a backwards shiitehole until we gave them acces to TRILLIONS in wealth and entry to the modern world in the last few decades.
“Made in China” was crap.
Regular starvation.
Regular flu epidemics.
No sense of sanitation.
Brutal subjugation.
Any other take is racist revisionist crap.
You: How?
Here's a quote from Darwin's Descent of Man on how "civilized" society is better off if we don't save the weak through vaccinations.
"With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed."
“It was then that scientists started to divide the world up into groupings of colour. Colour denoted civilisation”
Scientific?
More like Fauxcy “Science”.
*******
Religion denotes civilization. Judeo/Christian values produce civilization. Color and race are irrelevant.
The Chinese are, overall, a creation of the Chinese way of acting as they are the ones most responsible for what Chinese have learned, and how well that Chinese, using that training, have been able to compete with other Johnny Come Lately Groups of Humans on the planet.
well lets use the proper word as the crux of the entire racism debate... lets choose the simple would “Normal”. As an example i’ll use it it a sentence... ‘If a large percentage of the Black population, at least acted Normal, there would not be much Racism in this era...’
Simple right?? I’m mean now I’m a racist because i said Normal... See how this works?? and I’m sure there are many countries who feel the same way pertaining to “Normal”.
Asia has another little hang up i’m sure due to the “Appendage size” dilema, but that could be argued away i guess...
Its clear the CCP will use any tool be it lying or propaganda to try to prevent the formation of alliances which might serve to check its power. The US/Australia/the UK share a common history and culture and language and legal and political and economic systems. its hardly a surprise they would have an affinity for one another. It is also hardly a surprise that they would view an expansionist dictatorial China as a potential threat.
What the CCP did not point out are all the Asian countries that are equally suspicious of them. Of course that would undermine the narrative now wouldn’t it?
Correct.
” We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. “
VERY ANTI-eugenic!
R\ace does not sit at the heart of it all, but it obviously does for the unknown author of this article.
He, she, or it is insanely obsessed with race and hatred for Whitey.
He was saying that as a critique of civilized men, not as an endorsement. He was saying the unvaccinated populations wind up being stronger because natural selection makes the survivors in an unvaccinated population better, stronger, faster (sorry for the Bionic Man line LOL), while vaccination in a civilized population yields week people having offspring and keeping the gene pool week.
Read the part of the quote right after the portion you're commenting about:
"There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed."
Basically Darwin said that mankind would be better off if we treated the human race in the same fashion that animal breeders make sure only the best animals make babies without weak genes.
The people of Taiwan and Singapore (Chinese) throw the idiots whole theory out the window.
The idiot (a Leftist) ignores that the Communist Party of China is merely playing up the recial cannards created by American Lefists, to buttress their own domestic and gepolitical positions, that are actually imperialist agendas.
The Communists of China operate domestically as any imperialist would, making “nationalist” claims for their foreign imperialist ambitions. And now, with the help of the American Left they can add “against whiteness” as another pretense for their motives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.