[cotton1706]

She received applause from the types of Republicans who would go see her speak. Golly gee, what a feat!

No speeches in Wyoming, you'll note. But she's a big hit in California.

[ScaniaBoy]

Harriet Hageman statement on Liz Cheney’s speech at the Reagan Library

“Maybe she didn’t learn the definition of irony at the Virginia high school she attended, but Liz Cheney is the last one who should be giving lectures about the future of the Republican Party when she is singlehandedly trying to burn it to the ground. Cheney is using Wyoming’s only House seat to further her own personal war on President Trump, while helping Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats achieve their own political goals at the same time. She’s doing more to help the future of the Democratic Party than anything else.

“We sent Liz Cheney to Congress to represent Wyoming, not to help Pelosi distract voters’ attention away from the colossal failures of the Biden administration. Inflation is sky high, gas prices set new records every day, our southern border is in crisis, deadly drugs are flooding our cities and towns, and the attacks on Wyoming’s resource industries continue unabated. She ought to be more concerned with the future of Wyoming than anything else, but she’s quite obviously not.

“Thankfully, we have a debate Thursday night – a rare appearance in Wyoming from our congresswoman – where she will have to defend herself and her inaction on the issues most important to us. Wyoming is fed up with Liz Cheney, and in the debate, voters will be reminded of why that is.”

[Williams]

Screw her and screw them.

[cuz1961]

Liz Cheney Receives Huge Applause From Democrates impersonating Republicans For Speech Against Trump
/\
\/

Corrected for accuracy.

[Tallguy]

180,000 views seems awfully anemic. Just cruising by to see what the venue looks like (how full is the auditorium, how enthusiastic is the audience, etc.) and I would be ‘counted’ among that audience.

[DaBroasta]

No speeches in Wyoming, you'll note.

Yeah--you know it's bad when you're a Cheney and you can't even give a speech in a elementary school cafeteria in 'Cheney' country.

[COBOL2Java]

Liz Cheney Receives Huge Applause From Republicans For Speech Against Trump

[John S Mosby]

And Ronald Reagan would have had NOTHING to do with the Liz Cheney’s of this mindless plodding of RINOs. She is no conservative and disaster as a politician and human.

Trump is the only one UPHOLDING the Constitution— cleaning the Augean stables of which she is one crapping mare in the large paddock of “republicans” who are grifters in the Beltway, and of course in the Mil-Industrial-Medical complex. Her father- a nightmare of incompetence and GWBushes string puller of high profit perpetual wrongly directed war and waste.

[Boomer]

You have to look under the bottom of the barrel to find the dregs such as this J6 committee and Pelosi.

They are the black mold of politics needing a good soaking of bleach then replacement.

[jacknhoo]

Disgusting - we have voted in so many lesser-of-two-evil Democrat assistants. Of course we also can’t discount that our elections are compromised either.

[Vigilanteman]

No speeches in Wyoming, you'll note. But she's a big hit in California.

I wonder how much these psychophants had to pay for tickets.

[stockpirate]

Professional Prostitutes All, go figure prostitutes supporting other Prostitutes.

[Mr. K]

Sure she did... now go play elsewhere, newsweak.

(no one reads you anymore)

[joshua c]

can we see some names?

[faucetman]

Newsweak, what did you expect?

[Fiji Hill]

In her speech, Liz Cheney said, "Donald Trump attempted to overturn the presidential election. He attempted to stay in office and prevent the peaceful transfer of presidential power. He summoned a mob to Washington. He knew they were armed...and he directed the violent mob to march on the Capitol in order to delay or prevent completely the counting of electoral votes. He attempted to go there with them. And when the violence was underway, he refused to take action to tell the rioters to leave."

All of these charges are lies.

[sauropod]

/hurl

[Midwesterner53]

Ronald Reagan should have come out of the ground to throw her out of his library.

[Vaduz]

Their not Republican just democrats moles.

[Deaf and Discerning]

I didn’t know if Newsweek is considered a reliable, unbiased source, so I did a search.

As per Forbes, Newsweek was NOT on their list of publishers with the ten most high-risk domains:

1. Newsday (52 historical high-risk domains)

2. The New York Times (49 historical high-risk domains)

3. The Washington Post (20 historical high-risk domains)

4. The New York Post (16 historical high-risk domains)

5. Los Angeles Times (13 historical high-risk domains)

6. New York Daily News (10 historical high-risk domains)

7. USA Today (9 historical high-risk domains)

8. The Boston Globe (6 historical high-risk domains)

9. CSO (5 historical high-risk domains)

10. Chicago Tribune (5 historical high-risk domains)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherelliott/2019/02/21/these-are-the-real-fake-news-sites/?sh=37d84e723c3e

Do any of you dispute the above list?

Of course, some websites can deliberately re-arrange these lists to be skewed to please those writing these lists, regardless of who is reading them. For example, one site lists the New York Times and CNN to be the top two as being “unbiased”.

https://www.top10.com/news-websites

(I’m starting to feel sick...)

[dfwgator]

I’ll vote for a Democrat over that c__t.