Posted on 06/28/2022 1:11:03 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
To make it look like its legitimate, we are now in "Banana Republic" territory.
And after seeing the overreaction by leftists after "Roe" was overturned, even knowing it was going to happen a month earlier, and being over an insatiable lust to kill an unborn child, I now know we are dealing with a substantial number of irrational, immoral, and evil people.
Didn’t say this was a court proceeding. Both need to be under oath and at risk. Another proceeding would determine if there was perjury.
It’s hearsay from an unnamed source in a proceeding with no constitutional authority and no constitutional due process.
She’s under oath. He isn’t. Let him make the claims under oath and let a court separate who has perjured themselves.
sure ... and let’s have cross-examination and rules of evidence also ...
This isn’t a criminal proceeding.
exactly ... it’s all bullsh!t ...
You’re an idiot.
You act like the is a real trial!
LOL!
Pelosi stacked the deck by only allowing NeverTrumper Republicans on the committee and would not allow any evidence that contradicted the NeverTrumper narrative.
Furthermore, at least half of the so-called evidence presented by that liar today was second or third hand and would never be allowed in an actual trial because by definition it is heresy!
Under oath!
You are pitiful NeverTrumper!
So where is the Republican version? BTW, Trump is pissed at McCarthy for not having more Republican on the committee. So what is it? Apparently Trump wants more Republican’s on Pelosi’s fixed committee.
But can submit its findings to the proper entity to proceed. And perjury in a congressional hearing is a chargeable offense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.