Russia would be reduced to rubble at the same time; there will be no winner in that one. If we are involved as our treaty requires the same goes for us. China and India will be waiting to pick up the pieces. If we’re smart, we’ll take out China rather than have our few survivors become serfs to Chinese masters.
The day after Trump won in 2016 (the first time), Michael Savage said that meant there wasn’t going to be a war with Russia.
The puppet masters have been itching for ages to get this happening….
….it’s sick.
Remember, Mommy,
I'm off to get a Commie,
So send me a salami,
And try to smile somehow.
I'll look for you when the war is over,
An hour and a half from now!
--Tom Lehrer
True. So would Russia.
Both Russia and we would lose in 30 minutes. Our ballistic missile subs insure this. Some of ours will launch but some will not. The first launch insures total almost total destruction. The second launch is to just clean up what has not been destroyed. If all communication to our subs have been lost, they have a list of targets and they will launch.
It is that terrifyingly simple.
If they want to destroy Europe over this idiotic Ukraine misadventure, then we just have to light their funeral pyre and move on from there.
I certainly hope if they launch a nuclear mass murder, every Russian embassy will be breached and all of them slaughtered like the pigs they are.
Stop and think how evil and dangerous these dictators are.
We’ve been in plenty of conflicts, many fueled by the Russians (Vietnam) and we NEVER were so irresponsible as to start threatening nuclear war when something didn’t go our way.
The Russians need to remove Putin before that thug gets them all killed.
They are a very dangerous nuclear enemy, but if they start throwing nukes they will be decimated.
Anyway this stupid statement was that NATO will lose a nuclear war in 30 minutes. Ok thanks for the threat. So?
He’s only building more opposition to Russia.
If attacked by Russia, Russia will cease to exist in minutes from just our Boomers/FBMs.
There will be plenty of left overs for China, NK and any Muslim country intent on attacking us.
Our Sea Based Strategic Deterrent has the capabilities to keep the Russians/ChiComs in check.
Resources Fact Files
Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines - SSBN
The above does not factor in our Air Force’s response deterrence capabilities.
A Russian official has boasted that Russia would destroy NATO countries in “half-an-hour” if conflict escalated to the use of nuclear weapons.
—
NATO asked the VFS official, “Say Ivan, when was the last time you guys pulled maintenance on your nukes? Can you assure everyone that the maintenance funds actually were spent on maintenance and did not wind up in some VFS general’s pocket?”
Braggers rarely have the guts to follow through.
Braggers rarely have the guts to follow through.
Braggers rarely have the guts to follow through.
Braggers rarely have the guts to follow through.
Braggers rarely have the guts to follow through.
Braggers rarely have the guts to follow through.
Braggers rarely have the guts to follow through.
Mr. President! Wake up! It’s WWIII! The Russian missiles are flying? Wat?? Where’s the President? Is The President here! You are The President. Haha, good one. Where’s Jill? I need a diaper change. BOOOOOOM! CRAAAASH! Washington is a smoking crater.
And those who protest NATO's overall spending of only about 3% of its GDP are opposing Trump. For contrary to being a Putin puppet as the Left prevaricates - and who were blaming him in Feb. 2020 for this invasion, and contrary to you - the Trump,
July 11, 2018 U.S. President Donald Trump told NATO leaders on Wednesday they should increase their defense spending to 4 percent of their country’s economic output, double the group’s current goal of two percent/4/3/19..nearly all 29 NATO members have increased their defense spending since Trump came to office, and at least 16 of the 29 are on track to meet their 2024 defense spending goals. Defense spending among 27 NATO allies has increased consistently between 2016 and 2018, with Hungary, Norway, Romania and Turkey making some of the biggest increases.
October 21, 2020 NATO spending has increased for the sixth consecutive year thanks to new contributions from allies, Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said in prepared remarks Wednesday...Canada and European countries' spending increased this year at a rate of 4.3 percent...Russia and China's aggressive behavior during Trump's term is one reason for the allies' increased spending.
this administration has been much tougher on Russia than any in the post-Cold War era," said Daniel Vajdich, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council....
Take military spending: Trump sought to add $1.4 billion for fiscal year 2018 to the European Deterrence Initiative — a military effort to deter Russian aggression that was initially known as the European Reassurance Initiative. That's a 41 percent increase from the last year of the Obama administration. The president also agreed to send lethal weapons to Ukraine — a step that Obama resisted. And Trump gave U.S. forces in Syria more leeway to engage with Russian troops.
"Those loosened rules of engagement have resulted in direct military clashes with Russian militants and mercenaries on the ground, actually resulting in one incident in hundreds of casualties on the Russian side," Vajdich said.
The administration has also imposed sanctions on dozens of Russian oligarchs and government officials...
And from from 12/26/17 there is
Trump Sends Tank-Killing Missile To Fight Russia in Ukraine, But What Can It Do? By John Haltiwanger On 12/26/17 at 5:53 PM EST The decision to sell the Javelin missiles also comes not long after the Trump administration approved a limited weapons sale between American manufacturers and Ukraine of Model M107A1 sniper systems, ammunition and associated equipment...It's fired from the shoulder and tracks targets via infrared (heat signature). Instead of targeting the front or sides of tanks, which are thick with armor, the missile flies in an arc and hits the top of tank where the armor is weak.. Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko defended the move in a Facebook post, thanking President Donald Trump for his support. Poroshenko further described the arms sale as "a transatlantic vaccination against the Russian virus of aggression." - https://www.newsweek.com/trump-tank-killing-missile-fight-russia-ukraine-759745
And as reported by abcnews.go.com om Dec. 23, 2020,
"Previously, as reported by ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News, Headlines & Videos om Dec. 23, 2020, "Trump admin approves new sale of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine.." The new package included Javelin anti-tank weapons, 150 missiles and two launchers, which came after a first sale, completed in March 2018, which included 210 Javelin missiles and 37 launch units.. "The Trump administration first approved the sale of Javelins to Ukraine in December 2017 -- a step that former President Barack Obama never took.... ..
And when procurement costs are taken into consideration (how much it cost for training and materials in respective countries relative to what they spend), then despite having far less to defend, the US military budget in 2019 is not larger than the next eleven countries. Rather it is smaller than the next three.
https://www.eurasiareview.com/11102021-debating-defense-budgets-why-military-purchasing-power-parity-matters-analysis/
, “NATO countries will be destroyed by Russia in half-an-hour.”
Just like the Ukrainians would welcome Russians. Maybe like how you would roll over Ukraine in 72 hours. Perhaps how hard your soldiers would fight. Like how you had 8000 tanks 12000 personnel carriers.
These people don’t know how incompetent they are, what they don’t know is more important than what they are certain of. They have yet to have a stealth fighter, when the US first flew production models in the 1970’s. Their tanks just kill there crews like a jack in the box. Shut up dear Russian space expert, because I no longer fear your rhetoric when it comes to nukes. Wake me up when you win the war in tiny Ukraine……