Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scarborough: ‘Makes Perfect Sense’ the SCOTUS Leak Came from the Right
Breitbart ^ | 05/04/2022 | Trent Baker

Posted on 05/04/2022 8:30:37 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: ChicagoConservative27

Notice the leak came right as the public was becoming aware of Biden’s Truth Ministry. This was timed.


41 posted on 05/04/2022 9:37:24 AM PDT by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Two days ago Scarborough was saying the Ohio election would show Trump was losing his power...

What an idiot.


42 posted on 05/04/2022 9:38:30 AM PDT by GOPJ ("The party that says men can get pregnant wants to control 'misinformation' on the internet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

He’s not asleep, his eyes are just really, really tiny, even “beady” you might say.


43 posted on 05/04/2022 9:42:53 AM PDT by Blurb2350 (posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Scarborough’s eyes are brown! The leak reportedly camd from Sotomayor’s clerk; both of whom are left of Ho Chi Minh, and dumber than cow turds. But when it comes to dumb; Joe S. is at about the same level as Resident Joe B. JMHO.


44 posted on 05/04/2022 9:45:38 AM PDT by Tucker39 ("It is impossible so to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
What sense would that make? It only makes sense that it was from the left, or from a ‘swing’ vote on the court.

The Alito draft given to Politico has a nominal date of February 10, 2022. The accompanying Politico story also indicated that at the time of its preparation (and, apparently, still today) Alito's draft commanded the votes of four other Justices (i.e., Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett) but not, apparently, C.J. Roberts. This suggests -- and, for what it's worth, subsequent alleged leaks have indeed suggested -- that Roberts was inclined towards concurring in the judgment in Dobbs (which is to say, throw in with the five Justice majority in upholding the Mississippi law at issue), while declining to join the majority in overturning Roe and Casey).

If this is indeed the current state of affairs among the Justices, then the loss of one of the five Justices currently in the majority -- e.g., with either Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, or Barrett (although surely not Thomas) going squishy and throwing in with Roberts' more "moderate" position -- would result in Roe (and perhaps Casey) surviving after all.

Under this (admittedly speculative, but nevertheless reasonable) scenario, the leak of Alito's initial draft, which on its face is styled as "the opinion of the Court" -- which definitively establishes that, when drafted, it was understood to command at least four Justices in addition to Alito -- could be seen as a strategic ploy to "lock in" the aforementioned "squishy" Gorsuch/Kavanaugh/Barrett. Otherwise, when the decision in Dobbs was finally issued, and one of those three had defected, it would be obvious which Justice had folded in the face of Roberts' pressure.

So that's at least one plausible explanation for why it would make sense for the leak of the Alito draft to have come from someone aligned with those on the Court anxious to see Roe and Casey overturned. I have no idea whether any of this is actually true or not, but I don't see why that should be so hard to understand.

Furthermore, the informational leak to Jan Crawford of CBS News in July 2012, following the first Affordable Care Act case -- where Roberts rather obviously switched his position at the last minute -- is generally understood today to have come from (an obviously incensed) Justice Scalia himself. This little factoid of Court history in turn provides a certain precedent for this action. Moreover, this perceived earlier betrayal on the part of Roberts would serve to provide a motive for action on the part of someone who didn't want to see something along those same lines play out again in a case of this importance.

Again, I don't see why any of this is so hard to understand.

45 posted on 05/04/2022 9:45:40 AM PDT by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Just as the leaking blood came from his right hand when the intern was beaten to death.


46 posted on 05/04/2022 9:49:27 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What’s he smokin?


47 posted on 05/04/2022 9:58:19 AM PDT by Jaded (Pope Francis? Definitely NOT a fan... miss the last guy )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Killah Joe is desperate to stay on, lest he and PapRika have to find real jobs; but I believe Rashida Jones has faked them out by giving them that fourth hour before they have a new contract.
48 posted on 05/04/2022 10:15:15 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DSH
"Under this (admittedly speculative, but nevertheless reasonable) scenario, the leak of Alito's initial draft, which on its face is styled as "the opinion of the Court" -- which definitively establishes that, when drafted, it was understood to command at least four Justices in addition to Alito -- could be seen as a strategic ploy to "lock in" the aforementioned "squishy" Gorsuch/Kavanaugh/Barrett. Otherwise, when the decision in Dobbs was finally issued, and one of those three had defected, it would be obvious which Justice had folded in the face of Roberts' pressure."

Not necessarily. Occam's tilts to Sotomayor ordering the leak, to lock in someone leaning towards simply joining Roberts concurring opinion that saves Roe. Then you wouldn't know whether the squish was Kavanaugh/Barrett, or Roberts himself, or both. Possible, if not plausible, that any of those three could harbor enough reservations but thought being in a 5-majority would shield them, but now succumb to the demonic pressure to preserve Roe, and be shielded by joining Roberts.

The meta, unfortunately, is that in just 3 years time, the Democrats intentionally rendered impeachment as a political tool, and have now intentionally compromised the sanctity of the Supreme Court, because they can only continue to exist as a party if America is a banana republic.

49 posted on 05/04/2022 10:29:57 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Yeah, and it was probably D’Nesh Disousa...


50 posted on 05/04/2022 10:30:23 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The TRUTH will show what a LIAR this guy is.

LIAR.


51 posted on 05/04/2022 10:30:52 AM PDT by Pearfect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

He looks like the kid who stuck his tongue to the flagpole in “A Christmas Story”. About that smart too.


52 posted on 05/04/2022 4:29:59 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Don't blame me, I voted for President Trump. Let's Go Brandon! FJB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

“Just when I think ya can’t say anything dumber ya just keep on talkin.’’- Hank Hill.


53 posted on 05/06/2022 11:14:54 AM PDT by jmacusa (America. Founded by geniuses. Now governed by idiots. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson