Posted on 04/26/2022 7:14:34 AM PDT by from occupied ga
I wonder if that applies to the people languishing in jail over the false charges about January 6
While vets are sleeping on the streets and in cars...
From the employer’s perspective, better to have them stealing from the taxpayer than from the business.
I agree. I had my first paying job in 1958. And I’m still working full time. I never contemplated crime as a career - your name has to be Biden to be sure of getting away with that. So I’m not happy that criminals are getting paid with my hard earned tax dollars.
Taxpayer funded Democrat slush fund.
You hit that one out of the park
AS a former payroll supervisor: NO — NOT INTERESTED !!!!!
CANNOT MAKE A SILK PURSE OUT OF SOW’S EAR.
WHY do I want a sex offender on my payroll?????
A thief???
AS person with assault charges???
An embezzler???
A drug dealer?????
Driving a company vehicle????
MY liability insurance could be out of sight-—or cancelled.
YOU hire them-—
YOU put that sex offender into YOUR rental unit.....
You let that convicted DUI driver use your company truck......
This is WORSE than Affirmative Action Hiring.
I got my first full time job right out of high school in 1957.
I am now self-employed as an accounting person for small businesses. Still have ONE client—This is year 53.
I agree it's not ideal, but is it better than the alternative?
to go right along wi the not being able to ask about felony convictions or large gaps in a employment anymore
I’d just love to hire rapists, drug dealers and addicts. /sar never ever no matter what they pay me.
Those who studied, stayed in school, and spent their youth trying to avoid crime gangs lose out. Smart. 🙄
#1. What is “granting” a job?
/\
Making them an election official.
What else ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.