Posted on 12/10/2021 11:22:22 AM PST by cotton1706
One party, and their Assistants in the other party...
The scandal is that “the media” exists as an entity at all. Two things:
- In the second half of the 19th Century the wire services in general and the Associated (get it? associated) Press in particular homogenized journalism. Journalism coalesced decisively about journalists’ shared interest in attracting attention and influence. You know, “if it bleeds, it leads” and suchlike.
- The 1964 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan decision asserted that the First Amendment modified libel law. That was a novel and unconstitutional interpretation. The reason being that none of the amendments in the Bill of Rights was intended to modify anyone’s existing rights. In a sense the first eight amendments are basically window dressing, and the ninth and tenth amendments tell the tale. Whatever rights existed before the passage of the first ten amendments - including the right to sue for libel - existed unchanged after the passage of the BoR.
There is a dire need for a case to be brought to SCOTUS enabling it to reconsider Sullivan . Thereby enabling libel suits to destroy “the media.” Most especially the wire services. They are killing us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.