6th Circuit Court Rules Against Biden Administration in OSHA Vaccine Mandate Lawsuit

The Epoch Times ^ | 12-4-21 | Tom Ozimek

[Jeff Chandler]

They want obedience and couldn’t care less about consent.

Consent is a social construct.

[Enlightened1]

BTTT

[RipSawyer]

All must be jabbed, double jabbed, triple jammed, scattered and covered or we will all die! If we do all this we will all still die but the right people will have all the money when we die. If there be any error in my prediction let it be shown!!!

[StAnDeliver]

"I think the last thing that Deep State wants is this for this to go to SCOTUS. Because if Deep State uses SCOTUS to rubber stamp the mandate, then the last fig leaf will fall. And it will become very clear that we are no longer a republic."

Why would SCOTUS support the mandate? 5th Circuit en banc decision against Xiden will surely be appealed by the Zombii; there is a deep divide of opinions right now whether SCOTUS will let the 5th upholding 6th stand, or get 4 votes to take it on and use it to finally put Jacobson v Mass out of its misery.

The latter is a viable scenario if Roberts reserves the right to agree in part (OSHA portion of edict was fatally flawed) 5-4 and disagree in part (try to preserve the statist raison d'etre behind Jacobson).

[Eleutheria5]

I don’t think they can do a lateral appeal to another circuit court. If this was a full panel ruling, SCOTUS should be next.

[Eleutheria5]

Might I add a Nyahnyahnyahnyaaahnyah to your horse laugh?

[basalt]

why of course...you horse...

[Eleutheria5]

But to return to a more mature level of discourse, I’ll also say to Foe Jiden: Baby! Baby! Stick your head in gravy! Rap it up in bubble gum and send it to the navy!

[Svartalfiar]

In its Nov. 23 filing, the Biden administration argued that the Fifth Circuit panel erroneously interpreted the OSHA mandate, saying that “the speculative compliance costs and similar harms asserted by regulated parties cannot overcome the extraordinary harms to the public interest detailed above.”

“Simply put, delaying the standard would likely cost many lives per day, in addition to large numbers of hospitalizations, other serious health effects, and tremendous expenses,” White House lawyers alleged in the filing. “That is a confluence of harms of the highest order.”

Ok, let's say this virus had a 5% or even 20% infection fatality rate. Outside of closing borders and immigration, what Constitutional power does FedGov have then to do any mask or shot mandates? Hint: still NONE.

[MNJohnnie]

Beauty of these Judgments that keep coming in from the Courts is they all are pointing out the fraudulent basis of this arugment by Bare Shelves Biden's regime.

They are all saying basically

‘Look Joe it doesn't matter how big you manufacture the imaginary crisis to be, still does not allow you to circumvent the Law.’