Posted on 09/08/2021 12:54:27 PM PDT by NoLibZone
From GP
Here is the tweet about the Covid vaccine that got Alex banned:
“It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine.
So look at what the CDC did? Here’s the definition the CDC used on 26 August 2021:
Vaccine– “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
Vaccination– “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
Got it? A vaccine is supposed to produce immunity to a specific disease.
The problem is that Covid 19 is not a disease. It causes a variety of diseases. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky recently admitted that the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines are “waning.”
Rather than admit the Covid vaccine is not working as advertised, CDC took a page out of Orwell’s 1984 and opted for new spin language.
Here is the new definition:
Vaccine– “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
Note the subtle but important change. Instead of “PRODUCING IMMUNITY” the new definition moves the goal posts and states that their pseudo vaccine “STIMULATES THE BODY’S IMMUNE
The problem for people keen on protecting their health is that the Immune Response produced by the Covid vaccines appears to actually spark more Covid infection in some patients.
In light of Fauci’s demonstrable lying before Congress, it is time to stop trusting anything the CDC says.
Alex Berenson is taking a victory lap. He was banned from Twitter for claiming, CORRECTLY, that the Covid vaccine DID NOT PRODUCE IMMUNITY. Looks like the CDC now agrees with Alex.
“If you want to insist that ‘immunity’ means 100% effective in preventing disease, then please list three vaccines that are 100% effective in preventing disease.”
Please list common vaccines that have death rates and the serious side effects that covid jabs do and do not work at stopping the infections or spreading the disease.
Covidian Witnesses
Sirius Lee wrote: “Please list three shots that have proven to be so ineffective in preventing the disease it was designed to immunize against as the Frankenjab.”
Irrelevant. It has often been claimed that the COVID vaccines can’t be vaccines because people who have received those vaccines are not immune, ie, they can still get the COVID. If that is the standard, then there are no vaccines. For example, the smallpox vaccine is only considered to be 95% effective.
The shots listed, you don’t het the disease.
That was the standard until the cdc redefined it.
Nice try.
Darksheare wrote: “The shots listed, you don’t het the disease. That was the standard until the cdc redefined it.
Nice try.”
Actually, I’m still in the game. The claim was that ‘real’ vaccines are 100% effective and don’t require boosters. Read this:
I couldn’t find effectiveness numbers for rabies so I’ll grant you that rabies vaccines might be 100% effective. However, persons in frequent contact with potential infected animals should be checked frequently to ensure continued protection, ie, they might need a booster every six months to two years.
https://www.immunize.org/askexperts/experts_rab.asp
Tetanus vaccine is “The vaccine is nearly 100% effective in preventing tetanus and almost all reported cases of tetanus are in persons who have either never been vaccinated, or who completed a primary series but have not had a booster in the preceding 10 years.”
(Note: nearly 100% isn’t 100%).
https://medium.com/@visualvaccines/how-the-tetanus-vaccine-works-bae788b13bea
Tetanus boosters every 10 years.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/do-adults-really-need-tetanus-booster-shots-2020051219786
Pertussis:
“In general, DTaP vaccines are 80% to 90% effective. Among kids who get all 5 doses of DTaP on schedule, effectiveness is very high within the year following the 5th dose – at least 9 out of 10 kids are fully protected. There is a modest decrease in effectiveness in each following year. About 7 out of 10 kids are fully protected 5 years after getting their last dose of DTaP and the other 3 out of 10 kids are partially protected – protecting against serious disease.”
And, yes, boosters are required.
https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/about/faqs.html
IOW, none of these satisfy the FreeRepublic criteria to be a vaccine, either they are not 100% effective (2 out of 3) or they require a booster (3 out of 3)
But, as you said: “Nice Try”.
Irrelevant. The Frankenjab is nowhere even close to that effective, and actually kills more people than any other so called "vaccine".
Please list three shots that have proven to be so ineffective in preventing the disease it was designed to immunize against as the Frankenjab.
Sirius Lee wrote: “Irrelevant. The Frankenjab is nowhere even close to that effective, and actually kills more people than any other so called “vaccine”.”
That hasn’t been established.
Sirius Lee wrote: “Please list three shots that have proven to be so ineffective in preventing the disease it was designed to immunize against as the Frankenjab.”
Many vaccines have been withdrawn during testing which is truly irrelevant to whether something must be 100% effective and give life long protection/immunity to be considered a vaccine.
Yes it has.
Many vaccines have been withdrawn during testing which is truly irrelevant to whether something must be 100% effective and give life long protection/immunity to be considered a vaccine.
This one was rushed through testing and it was so deadly that two top FDA officials quit when the deep state/big Pharma pressured the FDA to rush approval through this killer jab.
Sirius Lee wrote: “This one was rushed through testing and it was so deadly that two top FDA officials quit when the deep state/big Pharma pressured the FDA to rush approval through this killer jab.”
The issue wasn’t testing. Those officials resigned because Biden gave the approval process to another organization when they thought it should be theirs. Nothing more than bureaucratic in-fighting.
Do you get tetanus after a tetanus shot?
No.
Polio?
No.
Pertussis?
No.
Again, nice try.
Keep changing the definition and spreading the approved propaganda.
Irrelevant. It has often been claimed that the COVID vaccines can’t be vaccines because people who have received those vaccines are not immune, ie, they can still get the COVID. If that is the standard, then there are no vaccines.
For example, the smallpox vaccine is only considered to be 95% effective.
Yes, but that 95% was good enough to completely eliminate smallpox from the world.
“Thanks to the success of vaccination, the last natural outbreak of smallpox in the United States occurred in 1949. In 1980, the World Health Assembly declared smallpox eradicated (eliminated), and no cases of naturally occurring smallpox have happened since.” CDC
How’s that compare with the CoVid shot?
chaosagent wrote: “Yes, but that 95% was good enough to completely eliminate smallpox from the world. How’s that compare with the CoVid shot?”
So, IOW, the standard for the vaccine to be considered a vaccines is that it has to eliminate the disease completely from the world before it can be considered a vaccine?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.