Brushing off Supreme Court rulings, Calif. county fines church as commercial enterprise

Just The News ^ | September 6, 2021 | Bethany Blankley

[Kevmo]

Santa Clary County officials will likely be ordered by a Federal Judge
***I’m in Santa Clara County, I HAD a federal stay against the proceedings and the county STILL went forth with them. They know that people can’t afford to fight in the appeals courts so they get away with it. There was even a demonstration against the judge in my case by about 100 people. I was interviewed by 4 news organizations, quoted in this article.

https://www.kqed.org/news/11857277/protesters-block-san-jose-courthouse-in-demand-for-stronger-state-eviction-protections#:~:text=Between%2050%20and%20100%20protesters,state%20and%20local%20eviction%20protections.&text=Six%20demonstrators%20sat%20in%20front,to%20prevent%20people%20from%20entering.

[Cen-Tejas]

Your so right. Back in the seventies and eighties, in Austin, the marxist council effectively confiscated thousands of acres of land for free by passing confiscatory regulations. Some developers took it all the way to the Supreme Court and won.

Months later, the City passed the same damn law slightly different which then sent many projects in to foreclosure which is exactly what the city comrades wanted.

Let’s face it, the Democrats are better fighters than our side in the courts.

[Cen-Tejas]

SB 91 outlines a complex scheme for distributing $2.6 billion in federal stimulus funding for rental assistance. Under the proposal, landlords can receive 80% of unpaid back rent for low-income renters — but only if they agree to permanently forgive the remaining 20% and not pursue eviction.

If the landlord doesn’t agree, however, the tenant is on the hook for coming up with 75% of the back rent owed.

Assemblyman David Chiu, D-San Francisco, said he’s concerned about the ability of landlords to opt out of rent relief for their tenants.

“The power imbalance between tenants and landlords is real and it’s troubling,” he said.

************************************************************

These Santa Clara County renters rights folks are demonstrating their marxist, what’s yours is mine DNA. “Fairness” concerning a roof over your head means “I build it, you pay for it”. NOT, I build it, I GIVE it to you!

Won’t work now, next year or next century even if the government confiscated all money!

And, as you know, “federal stimulus funding is a marxist play on words that really means “federal money stolen from others”.

[Kevmo]

marxist council effectively confiscated thousands of acres of land for free by passing confiscatory regulations.
***That happens all the time here in the SF bay area. One example. There were hundreds of acres of private land in Half Moon Bay, suitable for development but the coastal commission [one of the worst offenders of land grabbing] decided they wanted it to be open space, even though it was PRIVATELY OWNED. Their objection to development was sumthin like “doesn’t pass the percolation test”. So the owner put in self-percolating toilets as part of his plan, and the corrupt planning commission decided that JUST IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA, the zoning would be one house per 100 acres [or sumthin like that]. Totally corrupt. Just a few hundred meters away, they approved a private development which was a standard pay-the-bribes-to-the-council deals. Sickening.

[Cen-Tejas]

........what they usually use here is “impervious cover” meaning you can only put up buildings or pavement on a certain % of your land that they get to decide. If It’s pretty land they let you use 10% of YOUR land. If it’s ugly land in a bad neighborhood u can use up to 80%. Or, you can hand out bribes which around here are called “donations”. And, then there is the back alley kind on occasion. They wanted me to donate $100,000.00 for a pedestrian bridge. I called it the “dope” bridge. That kicked off a 15 year lawsuit that I won at the State Supreme Court level.

[Kevmo]

There are ways around this.

One way is to put up “temporary” buildings. Tents. You can lay down electricity, plumbing, sewer, a foundation, walls. But if you put one piece of wood on that roof, it’s considered a “permanent” structure. So you put canvas on the roof, replace it every 5 years or so. Very cheap way to build without permits.

Another way is to sell off portions of your land that is NOT subdividing. It’s called Tenancy In Common [TICs]. Been around since Roman times.

https://andysirkin.com/tenancy-in-common-tic/

In the category of TICs with usage rights, there are: .... “space-assignment co-ownerships” (or “SACOs”), which are intended to have the look and feel of condominiums or other legal subdivisions, and assign particular houses, apartments, rooms, offices, stores, or storage spaces to each owner;