Posted on 08/11/2021 9:42:18 PM PDT by jdirt
And isn’t it interesting how many on these threads are working to deflect from what is the real issue(s)?
I think they are planning to show pcap data.
And they are gearing up with a tinge of panic to create variants for a massive cheat in 2022.
Of course - they created millions of fake mail-in ballots.
But there was more to it than that.
They needed to make sure they wouldn’t have precincts where there were more votes than there were registered voters on record.
So they used voter registration amounts by age to set upper limits for the fake ballots.
But that wouldn’t be enough, so they actually inflated the registries wherever they could.
Again, it would be a red flag if the number of fake registered voters per age group exceeded the population by age group - so they used the census data to back fill the registered voter database county by county.
Yes, there were people counterfeiting ballots - running them multiple times, opting them, using the adjudication process to change ballots to Biden, bringing truckloads of faked ballots in to various key swing state precincts.
But the point is these people knew where and how much they could safely pad the ballots without red flags.
They made a lot of mistakes including 1) using algorithms to set their target limits - the cyber geeks saw suspicious patterns that weren’t natural. 2) getting greedy wherever Trump did better then they expected. 3) ignoring known bellwether precincts and states 4) etc..
Dennis Montgomery is an easy target. IF the data was provided by a patriot in the NSA then putting Montgomery up for the rabid dogs to focus upon wortks to protect the patriot. The data streams are real, but the negative naybobs are working hard to deflect from that truth.
“ Where did you hear he took the offer off the table? Not what I heard when he spoke at end of night. Source?”
You should be aware that you are responding to someone who’s working for the other side. Comments like that are designed to divert attention. He has zero proof of what he posted.
There are precincts with more votes than registered voters and they need to prove this happened with machines. Dr. Frank didn’t prove the machines were hacked.
They always cheat [even the pubbies do it], but it costs $$$money$$$.
Their supply of money isn't infinite.
In 2008, the Democrats tried to take Missouri. Zero lost by 4,000 votes. After that, the Dems gave up trying to take Missouri. 200,000 Democrat "votes" evaporated in the 2012 "election" in Missouri.
In 2016, Hitlary lost Missouri by 370,000 Democrat "votes", and joek got the 2020 tally back up to a 189,000 "vote" loss to President Trump in Missouri.
The DNC spent the Missouri money in 2012, 2016 and 2020 rigging more promising states.
I've done 2 states so far this way, and it's fascinating.
Most of the counties in the state preserve the Obama blowout numbers (joek's numbers don't beat Bammy's 2008 numbers).
EXCEPT in certain groups of Democrat-controlled counties. They're adjacent, which means they don't have the machinery in place to rig the entire state.
His cyber team lead Josh Merritt did an interview yesterday and said that the evidence that Lindell has is garbage and that the offer was withdrawn.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/11/mike-lindells-lead-cyber-expert-says-they-cant-pro/
I thought Merritt was discredited as not as trained as Sydney Powell first thought and he does not work with Lindell anymore - for a while.
seems a bit suspicious happening the day of the symposium, don’t you think?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.